Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Impact factors: uses and abuses.

James Neuberger1, Christopher Counsell

  • 1Research and Development Directorate, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK. James.Neuberger@university-b.wmids.nhs.uk

European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
|April 16, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An international multidisciplinary consensus statement on laparoscopic liver biopsy.

Cell reports. Medicine·2026
Same author

Toward Reducing Inequity in Transplantation of the Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: A Glimmer of Hope?

Transplantation·2026
Same author

Guidelines from the expert advisory committee on the Safety of Blood, Tissues and Organs (SaBTO) on patient consent and shared decision-making for blood transfusion.

British journal of haematology·2025
Same author

What price for increasing blood safety?

Lancet (London, England)·2025
Same author

Strong or Weak Consent in Medical Law? Identifying the Values Protected in Transplantation Medicine in Europe.

European journal of health law·2025
Same author

We should implement electronic blood management systems across the UK to improve blood transfusion safety.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2025
Same journal

Comment on 'Associations between 12 insulin resistance surrogates with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease risk and all-cause mortality: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (1988-1994)'.

European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology·2026
Same journal

Alarm symptoms at diagnosis of coeliac disease and long-term outcomes.

European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology·2026
Same journal

Artificial intelligence-integrated nanotherapeutics for rare Peutz-Jeghers syndrome hamartoma-induced obstructions: latest clearance strategies.

European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology·2026
Same journal

'Presence of alarm symptoms at coeliac disease diagnosis is not associated with poorer long-term treatment outcomes' [Letter].

European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology·2026
Same journal

Atrial fibrillation in patients with alcohol-associated hepatitis leads to increased mortality.

European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology·2026
Same journal

Association between albumin-bilirubin score, model for end-stage liver disease score, platelet-albumin-bilirubin score, and acute-on-chronic liver failure complications: a cross-sectional study in a Chinese population.

European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology·2026
See all related articles

Journal Impact Factors are widely used to assess research output but have limitations. While a useful tool, their interpretation requires careful consideration of context and potential biases.

Area of Science:

  • Bibliometrics
  • Scholarly Communication
  • Research Assessment

Background:

  • Quantitative metrics like the 2-year Impact Factor are increasingly used for evaluating researchers and institutions.
  • The Impact Factor measures journal citation frequency, aiming to reflect scientific merit.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the utility and limitations of journal Impact Factors in assessing scientific merit.
  • To discuss the implications of Impact Factor usage in academic evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the definition and common applications of the 2-year Impact Factor.
  • Discussion of inherent limitations, including journal-level vs. article-level assessment, temporal variations, and interdisciplinary comparisons.
  • Consideration of factors influencing Impact Factors, such as review journal prevalence and potential manipulation.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Impact Factors reflect journal prestige, not necessarily individual article quality or researcher performance.
  • Comparisons across different scientific specialties using Impact Factors can be misleading.
  • Review journals often exhibit higher Impact Factors than journals publishing original research.

Conclusions:

  • Despite significant limitations, the Impact Factor remains a widely used, albeit imperfect, tool for comparing scholarly output.
  • Effective use of Impact Factors necessitates understanding their constraints and applying common sense in data interpretation.