Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

DNA Microarrays02:34

DNA Microarrays

20.5K
Microarrays are high-throughput and relatively inexpensive assays that can be automated to analyze large quantities of data at a time. They are used in genome-wide studies to compare gene or protein expression under two varied conditions, such as healthy and diseased states. Microarrays consist of glass or silica slides on which probe molecules are covalently attached through surface functionalization. Most commonly, the slides are prepared through the chemisorption of silanes to silica...
20.5K
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs02:26

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

18.5K
Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
18.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Identification of the miRNA-mRNA regulatory network in multiple sclerosis.

Neurological research·2016
Same author

Long non-coding RNA PVT1 promotes osteosarcoma development by acting as a molecular sponge to regulate miR-195.

Oncotarget·2016
Same author

Fluorescent Nanocomposite for Visualizing Cross-Talk between MicroRNA-21 and Hydrogen Peroxide in Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Live Cells and In Vivo.

Analytical chemistry·2016
Same author

Propensity Score Methods in Nursing Research: Take Advantage of Them but Proceed With Caution.

Nursing research·2016
Same author

Optical Fiber Temperature and Torsion Sensor Based on Lyot-Sagnac Interferometer.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2016
Same author

Silica dioxide nanoparticles combined with cold exposure induce stronger systemic inflammatory response.

Environmental science and pollution research international·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 5, 2026

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress
05:22

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress

Published on: July 29, 2022

3.9K

A comparative review of statistical methods for discovering differentially expressed genes in replicated microarray

Wei Pan1

  • 1Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, A460 Mayo, MMC 303, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455-0378, USA. weip@biostat.umn.edu

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|May 23, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Comparing statistical methods for microarray analysis reveals differences in significance levels and gene detection. The t-test, regression, and mixture models vary in how they assign statistical significance, impacting results.

More Related Videos

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2
10:10

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Published on: September 18, 2021

40.7K
Profiling of Estrogen-regulated MicroRNAs in Breast Cancer Cells
16:24

Profiling of Estrogen-regulated MicroRNAs in Breast Cancer Cells

Published on: February 21, 2014

20.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 5, 2026

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress
05:22

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress

Published on: July 29, 2022

3.9K
Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2
10:10

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Published on: September 18, 2021

40.7K
Profiling of Estrogen-regulated MicroRNAs in Breast Cancer Cells
16:24

Profiling of Estrogen-regulated MicroRNAs in Breast Cancer Cells

Published on: February 21, 2014

20.6K

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Statistical Genetics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Analyzing microarray data commonly involves identifying differentially expressed genes between experimental conditions.
  • Several statistical methods exist for this task with replicated samples, but their comparative performance is unclear.
  • This study focuses on comparing the t-test, a regression modeling approach, and a mixture model approach.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare three statistical methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in microarray data.
  • To analyze the differing modeling assumptions of the t-test, regression, and mixture models.
  • To evaluate the impact of these differences on statistical significance and gene detection.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of three statistical methods: t-test, regression modeling, and mixture models.
  • Analysis of the statistical significance assignment for each method.
  • Illustration using leukemia microarray data (Golub et al., 1999).

Main Results:

  • All three methods utilize the two-sample t-statistic or a variation.
  • Significant differences arise in how statistical significance levels are associated with the statistic.
  • These differences lead to variations in significance levels and the number of detected genes.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of statistical method significantly impacts the identification of differentially expressed genes.
  • Understanding the distinct modeling assumptions is crucial for accurate microarray data interpretation.
  • Further comparisons are made with empirical Bayesian and Significance Analysis of Microarray (SAM) methods.