Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation
Yvonne H Carter1, Sara Shaw, Fraser Macfarlane
1Department of General Practice and Primary Care Barts and London, Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS.
A pilot accreditation scheme for UK general practices undertaking primary care research and development (R&D) was successful. Recommendations were made to progress to a national scheme, enhancing support and consistency for research practices.
Area of Science:
- Primary Care Research
- Health Services Research
- Research Governance
Background:
- The UK Department of Health has promoted research and development (R&D) in the National Health Service (NHS) since the early 1990s.
- Primary care professionals are uniquely positioned to conduct research, enhancing the evidence base for clinical decision-making.
- Growing opportunities and support infrastructure are improving research capacity in primary care settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate nationally accepted quality standards and accreditation for primary care research practices.
- To pilot an assessment scheme for UK general practices engaged in primary care R&D.
Main Methods:
- A pilot project funded by the NHS Executive South and West and the London Research and Development Directorate.
- Development of an assessment schedule with two levels: Collaborative Research Practice (Level I) and Established Research Practice (Level II).
- Assessment involved written documentation review and a half-day visit by a multidisciplinary team.
Main Results:
- A pilot involving 15 practices demonstrated a positive reception to the Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA) scheme.
- Level II practices showed a stronger research team ethos and strategic thinking compared to Level I practices.
- Areas for development included research strategy, communication, patient involvement, and methodology training.
Conclusions:
- The pilot project was successful, leading to recommendations for a national accreditation scheme.
- The scheme will be refined with enhanced support, mentoring, and assessor training.
- The accreditation scheme is recognized as a key component of the future primary care R&D agenda, aiding in research governance and alignment with health improvement priorities.
More Related Videos
08:13Development and Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Technology Enhanced Care Pathway for Youth and Adults with Concussion
Published on: January 20, 2019
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Patient-centered Care
Nursing Assessment
The nurse collects all aspects of the patient's health in the initial assessment, establishing priorities for ongoing focused assessments and...
Nursing Evaluation
Section...
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care