Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cross-dimensional interference and cross-trial inhibition.

Takatsune Kumada1, Glyn W Humphreys

  • 1National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan. kumada@nibh.go.jp

Perception & Psychophysics
|June 7, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Cross-dimensional interference in visual search occurs due to position priming effects. Inhibiting salient distractor locations slows subsequent target detection, demonstrating top-down visual selection.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A computational psychological approach to complex emotion: interest links complex emotion and attractiveness.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Development and validation of the Thoughts on Eating Scale: a domain-specific measure of belief orientations toward eating.

BMC psychology·2026
Same author

Mitigating the Low Prevalence Effect: Role of Removing Explicit "Target-Absent" Responses in Visual Search.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same author

Anatomical-connectivity-guided functional connectivity reveals task-relevant pathways during proactive task-switching via recurrent graph neural networks.

Brain informatics·2026
Same author

Evaluating human perceptions of android robot facial expressions based on variations in instruction styles.

Frontiers in robotics and AI·2026
Same author

Does information predicting "when" and "what" facilitate target detection interactively?

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2025

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Visual search involves identifying targets amidst distractors.
  • Cross-dimensional interference occurs when features from irrelevant dimensions disrupt search.
  • Position priming, where previous trial locations influence current search, is a known factor in visual attention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if cross-trial position priming contributes to cross-dimensional interference in visual search.
  • To determine the role of negative position priming in modulating cross-dimensional interference.
  • To explore the influence of top-down selection mechanisms in visual search.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Examined cross-dimensional interference using orientation-defined targets and singleton color distractors, assessing positive and negative position priming effects.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiment 2: Mixed presentation of trials with and without distractors to equate distractor presence probability, controlling for stimulus-driven factors.
  • Utilized controlled visual search tasks with varying target-distractor configurations and trial histories.

    • Main Results:

    • Cross-dimensional interference was observed in Experiment 1, disrupted by singleton color distractors.
    • Positive position priming facilitated search, while negative priming hindered search for targets at specific locations.
    • Cross-dimensional interference was eliminated in Experiment 2 under mixed presentation, suggesting top-down control over location inhibition.

    Conclusions:

    • Top-down selection mechanisms enable the inhibition of salient distractor locations during visual search.
    • Negative position priming, resulting from distractor inhibition, slows target detection at previously occupied locations.
    • The findings highlight the interplay between attentional control and stimulus-driven factors in visual search efficiency.