Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 12, 2026

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
Published on: December 5, 2014
Does information predicting "when" and "what" facilitate target detection interactively?
Byungju Kim1, Ryoichi Nakashima1, Takatsune Kumada1
1Graduate School of Informatics, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
None:
Human responses to environmental stimuli are essential for adapting to surroundings. Cue informativeness (how accurately a cue provides information about events requiring an action) can be pivotal in guiding behavior. Similarly, timing predictability (the extent to which people can predict when events will occur) influences their responses. However, the interactive effects of these factors on responses remain unclear. This study examined whether cue informativeness and timing predictability jointly influence target detection responses. Participants completed a cued go/no-go task in which we manipulated both factors via an online experiment. We used a constant cue-target delay in the timing predictable condition and variable delays in the timing unpredictable condition. Informative cues indicated a high probability of a go target, whereas non-informative cues signaled equal probabilities for go and no-go targets. In Experiment 1, both informative cues and predictable timing facilitated responses to go targets, with no evidence of interaction. Experiment 2 replicated these findings under more challenging conditions by introducing shorter delays, varying go targets, and adding rev-informative cues, which indicated a low probability of a go target, to mitigate response bias. These findings advance our understanding of cognitive processes in human operators interacting with assistance systems and offer insights for optimizing system design.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

