Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Consent, commercialisation and benefit-sharing.

D Nicol1, M Otlowski, D Chalmers

  • 1Law School, University of Tasmania. Nicol@utas.edu.au

Journal of Law and Medicine
|July 16, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Single Centre Review of the Management of Testicular Sex Cord-Stromal Cell Tumours.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2025
Same author

The dysfunctional immune response in renal cell carcinoma correlates with changes in the metabolic landscape of ccRCC during disease progression.

Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII·2023
Same author

Oncological outcomes and stoma-free survival following TaTME, a prospective cohort study.

Techniques in coloproctology·2021
Same author

How are genetic test results being used by Australian life insurers?

European journal of human genetics : EJHG·2018
Same author

Meta-analysis of the prevalence of renal cancer detected by abdominal ultrasonography.

The British journal of surgery·2017
Same author

Genomic analyses of tropical beef cattle fertility based on genotyping pools of Brahman cows with unknown pedigree.

Journal of animal science·2016
Same journal

Physician-assisted Suicide in Albania: Is It Constitutionally Protected?

Journal of law and medicine·2025
Same journal

Interprofessional Learning with Law and Medicine: "In Reality, No Profession Is an Island".

Journal of law and medicine·2025
Same journal

Nursing Management of Intoxicated Persons under Involuntary Legislation in Emergency Departments in Metropolitan Queensland, Australia; A Focused Ethnography Study.

Journal of law and medicine·2025
Same journal

Calling for Standardised Surrogacy Birth Care Policies: A Brief Report.

Journal of law and medicine·2025
Same journal

Lack of Informed Financial Consent by Health Professionals: Uncertainty & Secrecy.

Journal of law and medicine·2025
Same journal

Detangling AI Transparency in the Medical Regulation Space.

Journal of law and medicine·2025
See all related articles

Informed consent for commercial use of biological materials is ethically recommended, though legally uncertain. Source individuals currently have no legal right to profits from their biological samples, but ethical guidelines support benefit-sharing.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Biotechnology Law
  • Commercialization of Biological Materials

Background:

  • Increasing commercial exploitation of biological materials raises ethical and legal questions.
  • The source of biological materials may have rights regarding their commercial use and profit-sharing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the necessity of consent for commercial use of biological materials.
  • To investigate the rights of biological material sources to share in commercial profits.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of legal requirements for consent in commercial biological material use.
  • Review of ethical statements and guidelines concerning commercialization and benefit-sharing.

Main Results:

Keywords:
Health Care and Public HealthLegal Approach

Related Experiment Videos

  • Legal requirement for consent to commercial use of biological materials is uncertain.
  • Ethical consensus supports obtaining consent for commercial use.
  • No legal right exists for source individuals to profit from commercial exploitation of their samples.
  • Ethical support for benefit-sharing with source individuals and communities.

    • Conclusions:

    • While legal frameworks are evolving, ethical considerations strongly advocate for informed consent in the commercialization of biological materials.
    • Current legal standing does not grant profit-sharing rights to individuals for their biological samples, but ethical frameworks encourage benefit-sharing mechanisms.