Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 28, 2026
Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Tenderfoot Preemie vs a manual lancet: a clinical evaluation
B Kellam1, L M Sacks, J L Wailer
1Medical College of Georgia School of Nursing, Augusta, USA. mp5431gs@mail.mcg.edu
Purpose:
To compare the amount of time required to collect a blood specimen, the number of heel punctures required, and the rate of hematology re-collections required when using a Monolet lancet vs a Tenderfoot Preemie device.
Design:
Randomized, two-group, quasi-experimental.
Sample:
Neonates with a birth weight >800 gm were eligible to participate in the study. Twenty subjects were randomized to the Monolet lancet (control) group and 20 to the Tenderfoot Preemie (experimental) group. A total of 157 blood specimens was collected, 89 of which were for hematology testing.
Results:
For this sample population of preterm infants, less collection time was required, fewer heel punctures were necessary, and a lower re-collection rate occurred with use of the Tenderfoot Preemie than with use of the Monolet lancet.
