Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

High-resolution electron microscopy and electron tomography: resolution versus precision.

S Van Aert1, A J den Dekker, D Van Dyck

  • 1Department of Applied Physics, Delft University of Technology, Lorentzweg 1, 2628 CJ Delft, The Netherlands. s.vanaert@tn.tudelft.nl

Journal of Structural Biology
|August 6, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fast STEM image simulation in low-energy transmission electron microscopy by the accurate Chen-van-Dyck multislice method.

Micron (Oxford, England : 1993)·2024
Same author

Older adults' compliance with mobile ecological momentary assessments in behavioral nutrition and physical activity research: pooled results of four intensive longitudinal studies and recommendations for future research.

The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity·2024
Same author

Element specific atom counting for heterogeneous nanostructures: Combining multiple ADF STEM images for simultaneous thickness and composition determination.

Ultramicroscopy·2024
Same author

Atom counting from a combination of two ADF STEM images.

Ultramicroscopy·2023
Same author

Real-time simulations of ADF STEM probe position-integrated scattering cross-sections for single element fcc crystals in zone axis orientation using a densely connected neural network.

Ultramicroscopy·2023
Same author

A decade of atom-counting in STEM: From the first results toward reliable 3D atomic models from a single projection.

Ultramicroscopy·2023
Same journal

MLAC: MicroED-assisted ligand structure analysis in complexes and its application to hERG-ligand complexes.

Journal of structural biology·2026
Same journal

Ultrastructural evidence of autophagy-related processes and mitochondrial remodeling in the myxozoan parasite Henneguya piaractus.

Journal of structural biology·2026
Same journal

Architecture and dynamics of a supramolecular oxygen transport system in human homogentisate 1,2-Dioxygenase.

Journal of structural biology·2026
Same journal

Connecting pathways between mineralized fibrocartilage and bone at the Achilles tendon insertion.

Journal of structural biology·2026
Same journal

Structural and functional characterization of thermostable EstS1 esterase for BHET degradation.

Journal of structural biology·2026
Same journal

Following the white rabbit: multiscale 2D3D correlative imaging of bone structure.

Journal of structural biology·2026
See all related articles

This study redefines resolution in electron microscopy by introducing precision as a key metric. Precision in measuring component distances depends on factors like size, instrument resolution, and electron counts.

Area of Science:

  • Microscopy
  • Image Analysis
  • Scientific Measurement

Background:

  • Traditional two-point resolution in electron microscopy (EM) and electron tomography (ET) limits understanding of object details.
  • Prior knowledge and parametric modeling offer a new approach to interpreting EM and ET data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and define precision as a more informative metric than traditional resolution for high-resolution electron microscopy and tomography.
  • To investigate the factors influencing the precision of measuring distances between object components using parametric modeling.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing a parametric model incorporating prior knowledge of the object and imaging process.
  • Fitting the model to observational data to quantitatively estimate unknown parameters, such as component positions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzing the statistical nature of the experiment to determine measurement precision.

    • Main Results:

    • Precision, rather than resolution, is proposed as a key performance indicator for EM and ET.
    • Measurement precision is influenced by component size, inter-component distance, instrument resolution, and electron counts.
    • For electron tomography, object orientation relative to the rotation axis also impacts precision.

    Conclusions:

    • Precision offers a more quantitative measure for high-resolution electron microscopy and tomography when using prior knowledge.
    • Understanding the factors affecting precision is crucial for optimizing imaging parameters and data interpretation.
    • This approach enhances the ability to accurately measure and analyze nanoscale structures.