Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quantitative selection constants.

Scott E Kern1

  • 1Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21231, USA. sk@jhmi.edu

Cancer Biology & Therapy
|August 13, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hyperplasia Functions as a Link between Obesity and Cancer.

Cancer research·2026
Same author

Pancreatic cancer pathology viewed in the light of evolution.

Cancer metastasis reviews·2021
Same author

The genetics of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas in the year 2020: dramatic progress, but far to go.

Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc·2020
Same author

Genome annotation by shotgun inactivation of a native gene in hemizygous cells: application to BRCA2 with implication of hypomorphic variants.

Human mutation·2014
Same author

Salivary α-amylase, serum albumin, and myoglobin protect against DNA-damaging activities of ingested dietary agents in vitro.

Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association·2014
Same author

Are we systematically under-dosing patients with fluorouracil?

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2014
Same journal

Effective treatment of human breast tumors by chimeric CCL2 and CCL8 diphtheria toxin cytotoxic peptides.

Cancer biology & therapy·2026
Same journal

<i>NSUN2</i> mediates <i>SALL2</i> m5C methylation to inhibit ferroptosis and promote breast cancer progression.

Cancer biology & therapy·2026
Same journal

Targeting the PI3K/AKT pathway in prostate cancer: the role of PTEN deficiency and biomarker-guided therapy.

Cancer biology & therapy·2026
Same journal

ABHD17C regulates the efficacy of lenvatinib in suppressing hepatocellular carcinoma.

Cancer biology & therapy·2026
Same journal

Advances in SEC61G research: from ER translocon subunit to emerging pan-cancer oncogenic roles.

Cancer biology & therapy·2026
Same journal

Efficacy and safety profiles of CDK4/6 inhibitor in patients with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) from the high-altitude <i>versus</i> low-altitude regions: a multi-center retrospective study.

Cancer biology & therapy·2026
See all related articles

Human tumor genetics studies yield mutation frequency data. Mathematical models help interpret tumor-suppressor gene mutation rates, considering mutation, inactivation, and selection processes.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Cancer Biology
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Human tumor genetics research generates quantitative data on gene mutation frequencies.
  • These frequencies are influenced by various biological processes acting on genes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the quantitative interpretation of gene mutation rates in human tumors.
  • To formalize the understanding of tumor-suppressor gene mutation dynamics using mathematical models.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of numerical data on individual gene mutation frequencies in human tumors.
  • Application of intuitive mathematical models to conceptualize mutation rates.
  • Incorporation of factors such as random mutation rates, gene inactivation efficiencies, and selective pressures.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Mutation frequencies are influenced by multiple, differential processes acting on genes.
  • Mathematical models provide a framework for understanding the quantitative aspects of these processes.
  • Tumor-suppressor gene mutation rates can be systematically interpreted.

Conclusions:

  • Quantitative models are valuable for organizing and interpreting mutation rate data in cancer genetics.
  • Understanding these rates is crucial for deciphering the genetic underpinnings of human tumors.
  • Further development of mathematical approaches can enhance insights into tumor evolution.