Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026
07:36
An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Zero tolerance, zero evidence: an analysis of school disciplinary practice
1Indiana University, USA.
New Directions for Youth Development
|August 13, 2002
Summary
Zero tolerance policies lack evidence of effectiveness in schools. Research suggests exploring alternative, preventive strategies is necessary for educational environments.
Area of Science:
- Educational Policy
- School Safety
- Behavioral Science
Background:
- Zero tolerance policies are common disciplinary measures in schools.
- Evidence supporting the efficacy of zero tolerance is limited.
- There is a need to evaluate alternative disciplinary approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the lack of evidence for zero tolerance policies.
- To advocate for the exploration of preventive alternatives in schools.
Main Methods:
- Literature review on zero tolerance policies.
- Analysis of existing research on school disciplinary strategies.
- Identification of evidence-based preventive alternatives.
Main Results:
- Empirical evidence for the effectiveness of zero tolerance is scarce.
- Preventive strategies show promise in addressing school behavior issues.
Conclusions:
- Schools and districts should move away from zero tolerance.
- Implementing preventive alternatives is crucial for effective school management.
Related Concept Videos
03:20The Stanford Prison Experiment
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
01:08Obedience
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation, obedience...
02:20Milgram's Obedience to Authority
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
02:55Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...
01:27Punishment
Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior.
01:28Conduct Disorder
Conduct disorder is a complex mental health diagnosis characterized by a repetitive and persistent pattern of behavior that violates societal norms, the rights of others, or age-appropriate rules. The diagnostic criteria for conduct disorder require the presence of at least three problematic behaviors within the past 12 months, with at least one occurring in the past six months. These behaviors are grouped into four categories: aggression toward people and animals; destruction of property;...