Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Cell interactions with three-dimensional matrices.

Edna Cukierman¹, Roumen Pankov, Kenneth M Yamada

¹Craniofacial Developmental Biology and Regeneration Branch, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-4370, USA. ec89m@nih.gov

Current Opinion in Cell Biology

|September 17, 2002

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A targetable opioid/cancer associated fibroblast axis drives extracellular matrix remodeling and tumor aggressiveness in pancreatic cancer.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Pancreatic cancer.

Nature reviews. Disease primers·2026

Same author

Sensory neurons inhibit invadopodia and metastasis via direct CGRP-RAMP1-cAMP signaling to cancer cells.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Role of SCAP in regulation of pancreatic homeostasis, pancreatitis, and tumorigenesis.

Oncogene·2026

Same author

Pulsed Low-Dose-Rate Chemoradiation Induces Stromal Reprogramming in Pancreatic CAF-Generated ECM: Quantification by the HOST-Factor.

Gastro hep advances·2026

Same author

Generation of Primordial Germ Cell-like Cells from hESCs Using BMP4 and hAFSC-Conditioned Medium.

Methods and protocols·2026

Same journal

Mechanosensing in immune cells: Implications for migration and beyond.

Current opinion in cell biology·2026

Same journal

Emerging role of organelles in cell migration.

Current opinion in cell biology·2026

Same journal

Nuclear adaptation in cell migration.

Current opinion in cell biology·2026

Same journal

Patterns in motion: Choreographing dynamic cell behaviours during tissue repair.

Current opinion in cell biology·2026

Same journal

Quo vadis reconstituted cell surfaces? Purpose and future perspectives for minimal systems of the cell plasma membrane.

Current opinion in cell biology·2026

Same journal

Nuclear determinants of mRNA and protein isoforms.

Current opinion in cell biology·2026

See all related articles

Cellular functions and adhesion structures change in 3D environments compared to 2D. Studying fibroblast interactions in 3D matrices reveals insights into in vivo cell-matrix mechanisms.

Area of Science:

Cell Biology
Biomaterials Science
Tissue Engineering

Background:

Cellular functions and signaling pathways exhibit distinct behaviors in three-dimensional (3D) versus two-dimensional (2D) environments.
In vitro cell culture models are evolving to better mimic the complex in vivo microenvironment.
Cell adhesion structures can adapt and mature in 3D cultures, resembling in vivo adhesions with altered biological functions.

Purpose of the Study:

To review recent advancements in understanding fibroblast interactions within 3D matrices.
To highlight how 3D microenvironments, such as collagen gels and fibronectin matrices, influence cell behavior.
To elucidate the mechanisms governing cell-matrix interactions in physiologically relevant 3D settings.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

Review of current literature on fibroblast-matrix interactions in 3D culture systems.

Analysis of studies employing collagen gels and fibronectin-containing matrices as 3D models.

Examination of research focusing on cell adhesion and signaling within these 3D environments.

Main Results:

Fibroblast behavior, including cell adhesion and signaling, is significantly modulated by the 3D matrix properties.
3D matrices promote the development of in vivo-like cell-matrix adhesions with distinct biological activities.
These 3D systems provide a more accurate representation of the cellular microenvironment than traditional 2D cultures.

Conclusions:

Three-dimensional cell culture systems offer critical insights into cell-matrix interactions that are relevant to in vivo conditions.
Understanding these interactions in 3D is crucial for fields ranging from developmental biology to regenerative medicine.
Further research in 3D microenvironments will continue to illuminate fundamental biological mechanisms.