Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Heterogeneous risk models.

C M Suchindran

    Janasamkhya
    |June 1, 1989
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A reply to Avery and Hakkert.

    Population studies·2017
    Same author

    Calcium intakes and femoral and lumbar bone density of elderly U.S. men and women: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2006 analysis.

    The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism·2012
    Same author

    Using mixture models with linear predictors to identify incorrect gestational age in state birth records.

    Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology·2012
    Same author

    The effects of children on divorce and re-marriage: a multivariate analysis of life table probabilities.

    Population studies·2011
    Same author

    Micronutrient intakes in two US populations of older adults: lipid research clinics program prevalence study findings.

    The journal of nutrition, health & aging·2009
    Same author

    The multistate life table method: an application to contraceptive switching behavior.

    Demography·2008
    Same journal

    Generalized Lotka distribution incorporating migration.

    Janasamkhya·1994
    Same journal

    Implications of changes in family dynamics in India: 1971-1988.

    Janasamkhya·1994
    Same journal

    Modelling the frequency of out-migration with special reference to rural areas at household level.

    Janasamkhya·1994
    Same journal

    Maternal and child immunization on infant survival in Kerala, India.

    Janasamkhya·1994
    Same journal

    Estimating the person years lived in the infant and childhood ages.

    Janasamkhya·1994
    Same journal

    Sex differentials in Indian mortality: recent changes and implications for sex ratio.

    Janasamkhya·1994
    See all related articles

    Heterogeneous risk models in demography can produce non-monotonic marginal hazards. Recovering individual hazards from marginal hazards without structural parameters may yield biased results, impacting demographic analyses.

    Area of Science:

    • Demography
    • Mathematical Modeling
    • Survival Analysis

    Background:

    • Heterogeneous risk models are crucial in demography for understanding population dynamics.
    • Existing literature often assumes monotonic hazard functions, which may not hold in diverse populations.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review heterogeneous risk models in demography.
    • To demonstrate that marginal hazards are not necessarily monotonic in heterogeneous populations.
    • To identify potential biases in methods for recovering individual hazards.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized a specific mathematical model to analyze heterogeneous populations.
    • Examined procedures for inferring individual hazards from marginal hazards.
    • Discussed parameter estimation and hypothesis testing strategies.
    Keywords:
    BiologyDemographic AnalysisDemographic FactorsHeterogeneityModels, TheoreticalPopulationPopulation CharacteristicsResearch MethodologyRisk FactorsWorld

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Established that marginal hazards in heterogeneous populations need not be monotonic.
    • Showed that existing methods for hazard recovery can produce biased results when structural parameters are unknown.
    • Extended findings to multistate life table analyses.

    Conclusions:

    • The assumption of monotonicity in marginal hazards is not universally applicable in demography.
    • Care must be taken when estimating individual hazards from marginal data due to potential biases.
    • The study provides a foundation for more robust demographic modeling with heterogeneous populations.