Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

A reply to Avery and Hakkert.

C M Suchindran1

  • 1a University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill , N.C. , 27514 , USA.

Population Studies
|May 4, 2017
PubMed
Summary

The binomial model underestimates birth rate variance. While Avery and Hakkert

Related Experiment Videos

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Calcium intakes and femoral and lumbar bone density of elderly U.S. men and women: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2006 analysis.

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism·2012
Same author

Using mixture models with linear predictors to identify incorrect gestational age in state birth records.

Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology·2012
Same author

The effects of children on divorce and re-marriage: a multivariate analysis of life table probabilities.

Population studies·2011
Same author

Micronutrient intakes in two US populations of older adults: lipid research clinics program prevalence study findings.

The journal of nutrition, health & aging·2009
Same author

The multistate life table method: an application to contraceptive switching behavior.

Demography·2008
Same author

Macronutrient intakes of elderly in the Lipid Research Clinics Program Prevalence Study.

The journal of nutrition, health & aging·2004
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Demography
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Observed birth rates exhibit variance.
  • The standard binomial model may underestimate this variance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze discrepancies in birth rate variance.
  • To evaluate the approach of Avery and Hakkert.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of birth rate data variations.
  • Critique of existing statistical models and interpretations.

Main Results:

  • The binomial model's variance is insufficient for observed birth rate variations.
  • Avery and Hakkert's interpretation, while helpful, has limitations.

Conclusions:

  • The approach by Avery and Hakkert is not broadly applicable.
  • Further refinement of statistical models for birth rate analysis is needed.