Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Value conflict and post-decision consolidation.

Sanny Shamoun1, Ola Svenson

  • 1Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Sweden. ssn@psychology.su.se

Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
|October 4, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Airborne SARS-CoV2 virus exposure, interpersonal distance, face mask and perceived risk of infection.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Perceived Corona virus exposure as a function of interpersonal distance and time of a conversation.

Discover social science and health·2022
Same author

Cognitive bias and attitude distortion of a priority decision.

Cognitive processing·2022
Same author

Self-selected interval judgments compared to point judgments: A weight judgment experiment in the presence of the size-weight illusion.

PloS one·2022
Same author

Information about expert decision and post-decision distortion of facts of own decision.

Scandinavian journal of psychology·2017
Same author

Regulation of experienced and anticipated regret in daily decision making.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2015
Same journal

Eight-Week Minimal Dose Training Reduces Premenstrual Syndrome Symptoms but Does Not Influence Coping Strategies: A Nonrandomized Study.

Scandinavian journal of psychology·2026
Same journal

A Randomized Controlled Trial of an iCBT Program to Reduce Infertility-Related Stress: A Novel Digital Approach.

Scandinavian journal of psychology·2026
Same journal

Exploring Emotional Abuse, Physical Abuse and Mobile Phone Dependence in Left- and Non-Left-Behind Adolescents: Roles of Self-Esteem, Social Anxiety, and Loneliness.

Scandinavian journal of psychology·2026
Same journal

Swedish SDQ Norms for Internalizing and Externalizing Problems in Preschoolers.

Scandinavian journal of psychology·2026
Same journal

Exploring Toxic Positivity, Shame, Emotional Exhaustion, and Job Withdrawal Intentions in the Workplace.

Scandinavian journal of psychology·2026
Same journal

Cognitive Testing Practices for Basic Military Training in the Nordic Countries: A Scoping Review.

Scandinavian journal of psychology·2026
See all related articles

This study explored how people mentally adjust after making decisions involving value conflicts. Findings suggest laboratory settings may not fully replicate real-world decision-making consolidation effects.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Value conflicts arise when a chosen option is inferior on a key attribute.
  • Previous research relied on real-life decisions lacking experimental control.
  • Laboratory studies are needed to isolate and control value conflict dynamics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the restructuring of mental representations of value conflicts post-decision.
  • To compare laboratory-induced value conflicts with those from real-life decisions.
  • To test hypotheses regarding consolidation patterns, strength, and consequentiality.

Main Methods:

  • Value conflicts were experimentally induced in a laboratory setting.
  • Participants chose between two alternatives, one associated with a lower probability of success.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The study controlled for the importance of attributes and the consequentiality of decisions.

    • Main Results:

    • Mental representations of value conflicts were consolidated similarly to real-life decisions.
    • Less important attributes were also consolidated in the laboratory setting.
    • Consolidation effects were weaker than in real-life studies, lacking advantage reversals.

    Conclusions:

    • Laboratory consolidation patterns mirror real-life decisions but may include less critical attributes.
    • The absence of strong consolidation effects and advantage reversals questions the ecological validity of non-consequential laboratory decision-making studies.
    • Further research is needed to bridge the gap between controlled laboratory findings and real-world decision consequences.