Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 28, 2026

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
Published on: April 11, 2018
Importance of nonlinear and multivariable flexibility coefficients in the prediction of human cervical spine motion
Beth A Winkelstein1, Barry S Myers
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA. winkelst@seas.upenn.edu
Abstract:
The flexibility matrix currently forms the basis for multibody dynamics models of cervical spine motion. While studies have aimed to determine cervical motion segment behavior, their accuracy and utility have been limited by both experimental and analytical assumptions. Flexibility terms have been primarily represented as constants despite the spine's nonlinear stiffening response. Also, nondiagonal terms, describing coupled motions, of the matrices are often omitted. Currently, no study validates the flexibility approach for predicting vertebral motions; nor have the effects of matrix approximations and simplifications been quantified. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to quantify flexibility relationships for cervical motion segments, examine the importance of nonlinear components of the flexibility matrix, and determine the extent to which multivariable relationships may alter motion prediction. To that end, using unembalmed human cervical spine motion segments, a full battery of flexibility tests were performed for a neutral orientation and also following an axial pretorque. Primary and coupled matrix components were described using linear and piecewise nonlinear incremental constants. A third matrix approach utilized multivariable incremental relationships. Measured motions were predicted using structural flexibility methods and evaluated using RMS error between predicted and measured responses. A full set of flexibility relationships describe primary and coupled motions for C3-C4 and C5-C6. A flexibility matrix using piecewise incremental responses offers improved predictions over one using linear methods (p<0.01). However, no significant improvement is obtained using nonlinear terms represented by a multivariable functional approach (p<0.2). Based on these findings, it is suggested that a multivariable approach for flexibility is more demanding experimentally and analytically while not offering improved motion prediction.
Related Concept Videos
Kinematic Equations for Rotation
For instance, imagine a point A on a rigid body engaged in circular motion. The translational velocity of this particular point can be calculated by taking the time derivatives of the displacement equation, which essentially measures the...
Curvilinear Motion: Normal and Tangential Components
The positive direction of the t-axis aligns with the increasing position of the car along the curved path, denoted by the unit vector ut. Simultaneously, the n-axis, perpendicular to the t-axis, dissects the curved path into differential arc segments, each forming the arc of a circle with a radius of...
Adaptability of Cytoskeletal Filaments
Curvilinear Motion: Rectangular Components
As the car advances, its position evolves over time. Quantifying the car's velocity involves computing the time...
Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An immobile...
Angle of Twist - Elastic Range
