Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

An improved procedure for testing for assay linearity.

H A Ross1, C G J Sweep

  • 1Department of Chemical Endocrinology & Department of Endocrinology, University Medical Centre Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. a.ross@ace.azn.nl

Annals of Clinical Biochemistry
|January 25, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Validity of free testosterone calculation in pregnant women.

Endocrine connections·2019
Same author

Multi-locus DNA metabarcoding of zooplankton communities and scat reveal trophic interactions of a generalist predator.

Scientific reports·2019
Same author

Monitoring hypoxia and vasculature during bevacizumab treatment in a murine colorectal cancer model.

Contrast media & molecular imaging·2014
Same author

Harmonization of growth hormone measurement results: the empirical approach.

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry·2014
Same author

Estimation of mating system parameters in plant populations using marker loci with null alleles.

TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik·2013
Same author

Ten-year analysis of the prospective multicentre Chemo-N0 trial validates American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)-recommended biomarkers uPA and PAI-1 for therapy decision making in node-negative breast cancer patients.

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2013
Same journal

Routine laboratory triage for NT-proBNP elevation may reflect cardiorenal frailty as much as heart failure specificity.

Annals of clinical biochemistry·2026
Same journal

From interpretable NT-proBNP prediction to equitable laboratory stewardship.

Annals of clinical biochemistry·2026
Same journal

Serum Sclerostin Levels in Children with Osteogenesis Imperfecta.

Annals of clinical biochemistry·2026
Same journal

Population-Specific HOMA-IR Reference Ranges in Iraq: Defining Insulin Sensitivity in a Middle Eastern Cohort.

Annals of clinical biochemistry·2026
Same journal

Optimizing Laboratory Quality with Sigma Metrics: Application of CLIA 2024 Total Allowable Error Guidelines.

Annals of clinical biochemistry·2026
Same journal

Suspected thermal amplitude of cryoglobulin likely more clinically significant than size detected: A case report.

Annals of clinical biochemistry·2026
See all related articles

Statistical analysis of assay linearity can now quantify deviations, determining if assay performance needs improvement for specific applications. This provides objective measures for non-linearity and minimum detectable deviation.

Area of Science:

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Traditional statistical testing for assay linearity using replicate measurements on binary mixtures lacks significance assessment for deviations.
  • Assessing the significance of deviations from linearity is often crucial for assay validation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a statistical method for quantifying the significance of deviations from assay linearity.
  • To provide objective measures for assay non-linearity and minimum detectable deviation.

Main Methods:

  • Performed additional statistical analysis on existing assay data.
  • Applied calculations to determine objective measures of non-linearity.

Main Results:

  • Obtained objective measures for assay non-linearity.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Determined the minimum detectable deviation from linearity for the assay.

    • Conclusions:

    • Additional calculations enable assessment of assay method performance.
    • The method allows determination of whether assay improvements are needed for intended applications.