Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2026
14:43
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Complementary and alternative groups contemplate the need for effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness research
M J Kelner1, H Boon, B Wellman
1Institute for Human Development, Life Course and Aging, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.
Complementary Therapies in Medicine
|February 22, 2003
Summary
Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) groups differ in their views on research. More formally organized CAM groups, like chiropractic, are more likely to support evidence-based practices, while others show less interest in demonstrating effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Integrative Medicine
- Health Services Research
- Qualitative Research
Background:
- Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) encompasses diverse therapies and practices.
- There is ongoing debate regarding the scientific validation of CAM interventions.
- Understanding CAM practitioners' perspectives on evidence is crucial for integration into healthcare systems.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the perspectives of different CAM groups on the necessity of demonstrating effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of their therapies.
- To identify factors influencing CAM practitioners' engagement with scientific research.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative interviews were conducted with 22 representatives from three distinct CAM groups: chiropractic, homeopathy, and Reiki.
- A qualitative content analysis approach was employed to analyze interview data, identifying commonalities and divergences.
- The study was conducted in Ontario, Canada.
Main Results:
- Significant differences in viewpoints were observed among the three CAM groups.
- Chiropractic representatives strongly supported the need for scientific evidence of efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness.
- Homeopathy representatives expressed divided opinions, while Reiki representatives showed minimal interest in research.
Conclusions:
- The level of formal organization within CAM groups appears to correlate with their recognition of the importance of scientific research.
- Formally structured CAM professions are more inclined to embrace evidence-based practices and research validation.
- Further research is needed to explore the nuances of CAM practitioners' attitudes toward scientific inquiry.
Related Concept Videos
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
01:09Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications
The concept of therapeutic equivalence (TE) in drugs with multiple indications is complex. A generic drug may be therapeutically equivalent to a brand-name product for one specific indication, but this doesn't necessarily mean it's equivalent for all other indications. Evidence of TE in one patient group and bioequivalence shown in healthy volunteers can support—but not confirm—TE for other indications. However, definitive proof requires individual clinical studies for each indication due to...
01:20Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...
01:12Hazard Ratio
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...
01:26Group Therapy
Group therapy is a sociocultural approach to psychological treatment, where individuals with shared psychological challenges come together under the guidance of a mental health professional. This therapeutic modality offers unique opportunities for individuals to connect, share, and grow within the context of a supportive group. By fostering mutual understanding and collaboration, group therapy can address a range of psychological concerns effectively, often complementing or surpassing the...
01:28Self-Help Support Groups
Self-help support groups are voluntary, community-based organizations that provide a platform for individuals with shared concerns to exchange support, insights, and practical strategies for coping with life challenges. Typically led by group members or paraprofessionals, these groups form a cornerstone of mental health care, especially in reaching populations that are underserved by traditional healthcare systems.
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...