Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 21, 2026

Initial Evaluation of Antibody-conjugates Modified with Viral-derived Peptides for Increasing Cellular Accumulation and Improving Tumor Targeting
Published on: March 8, 2018
Promises and pitfalls of anti-angiogenic therapy in clinical trials
Marya F McCarty1, Wenbiao Liu, Fan Fan
1Dept of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, P.O. Box 444, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Abstract:
A significant body of research has implicated the process of angiogenesis in the growth and spread of tumors. Elucidation of the mechanisms of tumor angiogenesis has led to the development of multiple anti-angiogenic agents. However, the perceived differences between the results of preclinical studies and those of early phases of clinical trials have led to questions being asked regarding the efficacy of these agents. There are many reasons for this discrepancy, including difficulties in the appropriate interpretation of preclinical data and clinical trial design. Further insights into the complex process of angiogenesis are essential for the development of effective anti-angiogenic regimens.
Insights
Research into tumor angiogenesis and anti-angiogenic agents reveals discrepancies between preclinical and clinical results. Understanding angiogenesis mechanisms is key to developing effective cancer treatments.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Biochemistry
Background:
- Tumor growth and metastasis are significantly influenced by angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels.
- Numerous anti-angiogenic agents have been developed based on research into tumor angiogenesis mechanisms.
- Discrepancies between preclinical findings and early clinical trial outcomes raise questions about the efficacy of current anti-angiogenic therapies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the reasons behind the observed differences between preclinical and clinical trial results for anti-angiogenic agents.
- To highlight the importance of accurate preclinical data interpretation and robust clinical trial design.
- To emphasize the need for deeper understanding of angiogenesis for improved therapeutic strategies.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on tumor angiogenesis and anti-angiogenic drug development.
- Analysis of factors contributing to discrepancies in efficacy data.
- Discussion of challenges in preclinical to clinical translation.
Main Results:
- Preclinical studies often show promising results that do not fully translate to clinical efficacy.
- Inconsistent interpretation of preclinical data and suboptimal clinical trial designs are major contributing factors.
- The complexity of tumor angiogenesis presents significant challenges for therapeutic intervention.
Conclusions:
- Further elucidation of tumor angiogenesis mechanisms is critical for advancing anti-angiogenic therapies.
- Improved methodologies for preclinical research and clinical trial design are necessary.
- A comprehensive understanding is essential for developing more effective anti-angiogenic treatment regimens.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanism of Angiogenesis
Regulation of Angiogenesis and Blood Supply

