Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Stool tagging applied in thin-slice multidetector computed tomography colonography.

Maarten Thomeer1, Iacopo Carbone, Hilde Bosmans

  • 1Department of Radiology, University Hospitals, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. maartenthomeer@yahoo.com

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
|April 19, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spleen metastasis as rare systemic manifestation of thymoma: a case report.

Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China)·2026
Same author

Personalized Contrast Agent Volumes in Abdominal CT: Bridging Theory with Practice.

Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology·2025
Same author

Radiation exposure in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Journal of Crohn's & colitis·2025
Same author

Plain language summary of SUNLIGHT: trifluridine/tipiracil and bevacizumab for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

Future oncology (London, England)·2024
Same author

Prognostic value of liver metastases in colorectal cancer treated by systemic therapy: An ARCAD pooled analysis.

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2024
Same author

Multidisciplinary Delphi Consensus on Safety of Combining Transarterial Radioembolization with Yttrium-90 Microspheres with Systemic Anticancer Agents for the Treatment of Liver Malignancy.

Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR·2024
Same journal

Low-Field Neuroimaging: Opportunities and Limitations.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·2026
Same journal

Diagnostic Performance of Routine Abdominal MRI for Detecting Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in ADPKD.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI With Diffusion and Clinicopathologic Features for Predicting Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·2026
Same journal

Artificial Intelligence for Opportunistic Screening for Osteoporosis and Spine Fractures Using Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·2026
Same journal

Accuracy and Variability of Spatial Localization of Infarct Core Predicted by CT Perfusion.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·2026
Same journal

Acute Biliary Disorders and Complications.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·2026
See all related articles

Computed tomography colonography (CTC) with stool tagging shows high sensitivity and specificity for detecting polyps, especially larger ones. This technique offers a promising alternative for colorectal cancer screening.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Gastroenterology
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening

Background:

  • Colonoscopy is the standard for colorectal polyp detection.
  • Computed tomography colonography (CTC) is an alternative imaging modality.
  • Improving CTC accuracy, particularly for small polyps, remains a focus.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the diagnostic performance of thin-slice multidetector CTC with stool tagging against colonoscopy.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of iodinated contrast for tagging residual colonic fluid and stool.

Main Methods:

  • 150 patients underwent high-resolution CTC with iodinated contrast for stool tagging.
  • Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for two independent readers.
  • Performance was analyzed for the entire cohort and split into two halves to assess learning curve effects.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Stool tagging was optimal in 95.3% of cases, with high reader confidence.
  • Sensitivities for 5-9 mm polyps were 64.1%-66.7%, and 91.7% for larger polyps.
  • Sensitivity for 5-9 mm polyps improved from 54.2%-58.3% to 80% during the study; larger polyp sensitivity reached 100%.

Conclusions:

  • High-resolution CTC with fluid tagging demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity.
  • This technique is particularly effective for detecting larger polyps (≥10 mm).
  • The study suggests CTC with stool tagging is a viable and accurate method for colorectal polyp detection.