Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cochlear implants: some likely next steps.

Blake S Wilson1, Dewey T Lawson, Joachim M Muller

  • 1Center for Auditory Prosthesis Research, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA. bsw@rti.org

Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering
|April 22, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Auditory-Visual Stroop Test to Assess Subjects with Tinnitus.

Brain sciences·2026
Same author

Tinnitus and Reactions to Tinnitus: A Cross-Sectional Survey Across Different Tinnitus Durations.

Audiology research·2026
Same author

Tinnitus patient challenges and frustrations with current treatments.

Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)·2026
Same author

The effect of cochlear implant pulse phase duration on stimulus rankings according to pitch.

JASA express letters·2026
Same author

An open-label, proof-of-mechanism trial evaluating a neuroactive steroid GABA modulator in tinnitus.

Frontiers in neurology·2025
Same author

Development and Effectiveness of Tinnitus Activities Treatment-Online, a Self-Paced Remote Counseling Program.

American journal of audiology·2025
Same journal

Physics-Informed Machine Learning in Biomedical Science and Engineering.

Annual review of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Advancements and Challenges in Computer-Assisted Medical Interventions for Image-Guided Prostate Cancer Treatments.

Annual review of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Recent Advances in mRNA Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines.

Annual review of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Artificial Intelligence-Based Analysis of Laparoscopic Imaging for Intraoperative Surgical Decision Support.

Annual review of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Viscoelasticity of the Heart: An Overview of Viscoelastic Measurements at Different Scales.

Annual review of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Digital Twins for Biofluids.

Annual review of biomedical engineering·2026
See all related articles

Cochlear implants have advanced significantly, but don't restore normal hearing, especially in noise. Future improvements may involve combined electric/acoustic stimulation, bilateral implants, and better processing strategies for enhanced speech reception.

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Cochlear implant (CI) technology has seen substantial performance gains over the last 20 years, driven by advanced signal processing strategies.
  • Despite progress, current CIs do not fully restore normal speech reception, particularly in challenging listening environments like noisy settings or multi-talker situations.
  • A significant variability in patient outcomes persists, with some individuals benefiting greatly while others experience limited improvement with the same devices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and discuss potential avenues for enhancing cochlear implant performance.
  • To explore strategies that could improve speech understanding for CI users, especially in complex auditory scenarios.
  • To identify factors contributing to the wide range of outcomes observed in cochlear implant recipients.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • This review synthesizes current research and discusses emerging technologies and approaches in cochlear implant development.
  • It examines strategies such as combined electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS) for patients with residual hearing.
  • The review also considers the use of bilateral cochlear implants and improved biomimetic processing strategies.

Main Results:

  • Future improvements may stem from combined electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS) for individuals with residual hearing.
  • Bilateral cochlear implantation offers potential benefits for sound localization and speech understanding.
  • More closely replicating the natural processing steps of the cochlea in implantable devices is a key area for advancement.

Conclusions:

  • Further advancements in cochlear implant technology are necessary to achieve normal speech reception, particularly in noise.
  • Exploring combined electric and acoustic stimulation, bilateral implantation, and biomimetic processing holds promise for improving CI outcomes.
  • Understanding and addressing factors correlated with patient outcomes can help optimize benefits for all recipients, especially those currently at the lower end of the performance spectrum.