Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Optimizing electrotherapy--a comparative study of 3 different currents].

Richard Crevenna1, Martin Posch, Andrea Sochor

  • 1Universitätsklinik für Physikalische Medizin und Rehabilitation, AKH Wien, Osterreich.

Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift
|April 24, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A prematurely terminated phase 2, randomised trial to evaluate immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a single versus two-dose primary vaccination regimen of the mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 in previously SARS-CoV-2 infected children 5-11 years old (CoVacc trial).

Vaccine·2026
Same author

Impact of Information Leakage in Platform Trials With Survival Endpoints on Type I Error Control.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same author

On the Inclusion of Non-Concurrent Controls in Platform Trials With an Interim Analysis.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Towards integrated people-centred health services: patient-reported experiences of post-COVID care in Austria.

Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)·2026
Same author

Biophysical and Raman Spectroscopy assessment of drug-induced photosensitivity: Insights from a randomised controlled pilot study.

European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences·2026
Same author

Extremity Ultrasound vs. Computed Tomography at the Third Lumbar Vertebra Level for Assessing the Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue-to-Muscle Ratio.

Nutrients·2026
Same journal

Systematic review of clinical evidence for Kneipp medicine.

Wiener klinische Wochenschrift·2026
Same journal

Pelvic resections in primary sarcomas : Surgical outcomes and survival analysis of 75 patients.

Wiener klinische Wochenschrift·2026
Same journal

Jungmediziner*innen am Start: 11. Workshop für den medizinischen Nachwuchs.

Wiener klinische Wochenschrift·2026
Same journal

Stellungnahme der ÖGP zur geplanten Gesetzesnovelle zum Nichtraucherschutzgesetz.

Wiener klinische Wochenschrift·2026
Same journal

MUW researcher of the month: Dr. Moritz Schaefer.

Wiener klinische Wochenschrift·2026
Same journal

Alopecia areata: current concepts.

Wiener klinische Wochenschrift·2026
See all related articles

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) can enhance muscle strength. The biphasic current form offers superior therapeutic benefits by maximizing muscle strength gains while minimizing discomfort compared to monophasic forms.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Sports Medicine
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is utilized for skeletal muscle strengthening.
  • Optimizing NMES for therapeutic success involves maximizing current intensity while managing patient discomfort.
  • Comparing different electrical current waveforms is crucial for enhancing NMES efficacy and patient tolerance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare subjective tolerance and maximum achievable muscular strength across three distinct electrical current forms.
  • To determine the optimal electrical current waveform for therapeutic muscle strengthening applications.
  • To evaluate the trade-off between discomfort and strength gains for different NMES parameters.

Main Methods:

  • A single-blind, randomized study involving 29 healthy male volunteers.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Application of three electrical current types (short monophasic, long monophasic, biphasic) to knee extensors via surface electrodes.
  • Progressive intensity increase to individual tolerance limit or 100 mA, measuring maximum electrically induced strength relative to maximal voluntary contraction.

    • Main Results:

    • Short monophasic current caused significantly less discomfort than long monophasic and biphasic forms (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0062).
    • Biphasic current demonstrated better tolerance than long monophasic current (p = 0.041).
    • Biphasic and long monophasic forms induced significantly greater maximum electrically induced strength than the short monophasic form (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0010).

    Conclusions:

    • The biphasic current form offers a superior therapeutic range, balancing discomfort and strength gains effectively.
    • Biphasic NMES resulted in approximately 40% greater electrically induced strength compared to the short monophasic form.
    • Biphasic electrical current is recommended as a more effective waveform for therapeutic muscle strengthening applications than the studied monophasic forms.