Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methods for microbial DNA extraction from soil for PCR amplification.

C Yeates1, M R Gillings, A D Davison

  • 1Key Centre for Biodiversity and Bioresources, School of Biological Sciences. Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109. Australia. cyeates@rna.bio.mq.edu.au

Biological Procedures Online
|May 8, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Role of active and environmental tobacco smoke on susceptibility to osteoporosis in women undergoing dual-X-ray absorptiometry.

Journal of endocrinological investigation·2023
Same author

Pollutants That Replicate: Xenogenetic DNAs.

Trends in microbiology·2018
Same author

Corrigendum to "Chemical, biological, and DNA markers for tracing slaughterhouse effluent" [Environ. Res. 156 (2017) 534-541].

Environmental research·2017
Same author

Chemical, biological, and DNA markers for tracing slaughterhouse effluent.

Environmental research·2017
Same author

Survival of a lacZY-marked strain of Pseudomonas corrugata following a field release.

FEMS microbiology ecology·2009
Same author

Cultivation of fastidious bacteria by viability staining and micromanipulation in a soil substrate membrane system.

Applied and environmental microbiology·2009
Same journal

MKRN1 suppresses cuproptosis in colorectal cancer through ubiquitin-dependent regulation of SLC31A1.

Biological procedures online·2026
Same journal

Ethacrynic Oxadiazole 6u Induces Apoptosis by Targeting mTOR/c-Flip Axis and Noxa in Lymphoma Cells.

Biological procedures online·2026
Same journal

Development and Comparison of Two Rabbit Tibiofemoral Joint Replacement Models.

Biological procedures online·2026
Same journal

A novel prognostic model based on MVIRGs identifies ANGPT2 as a key target driving the malignant progression of HCC.

Biological procedures online·2026
Same journal

Lipid Metabolic Rewiring During Continuous Prostate Cancer Progression Defines a Biologically Relevant Four-Gene Prognostic Signature.

Biological procedures online·2026
Same journal

Targeting Hyaluronan Signaling Overcomes Primary Effusion Lymphoma Cells Resistance to Rapamycin.

Biological procedures online·2026
See all related articles

A new DNA extraction method for soil samples offers rapid, inexpensive, and large-scale DNA recovery. This method effectively minimizes co-purified contaminants, enabling successful polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification.

Area of Science:

  • Environmental microbiology
  • Molecular biology
  • Soil science

Background:

  • Soil DNA extraction is crucial for microbial community analysis.
  • Co-purified contaminants often inhibit downstream molecular applications like PCR.
  • Existing methods can be time-consuming, expensive, or lack scalability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a rapid, inexpensive, and scalable DNA extraction method for diverse soil types.
  • To ensure the extracted soil DNA is suitable for Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) amplification.
  • To compare the developed method against existing techniques for DNA purity and size.

Main Methods:

  • Direct lysis of 100g soil using glass beads and SDS.
  • Purification steps including potassium acetate, polyethylene glycol, phenol extraction, and isopropanol precipitation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of the new method with other DNA extraction protocols.

    • Main Results:

    • The developed method provides a rapid and cost-effective means for large-scale soil DNA extraction.
    • DNA extracted using this method is suitable for various DNA targets in PCR amplification.
    • The method demonstrates effectiveness across different soil types with minimal purification.

    Conclusions:

    • A novel, efficient DNA extraction protocol for soil samples has been established.
    • This method overcomes common inhibition issues caused by soil contaminants.
    • The protocol is applicable for large-scale studies and downstream PCR-based analyses.