Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Boston Naming Test: problems with administration and scoring.

Michael N Lopez1, Griselda P Arias, Marnie A Hunter

  • 1Department of Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, MH Group/Behavioral Health Section, Long Beach, California 90822, USA.

Psychological Reports
|June 6, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Standardized Beck Depression Inventory-II scores for male veterans coping with chronic pain.

Psychological services·2012
Same author

A novel immunogen to modulate cytokine production and promote immune system reconstitution in HIV-AIDS.

American journal of therapeutics·2011
Same author

Statistical extensions of Ponterotto and Ruckdeschel's (2007) reliability matrix for estimating the adequacy of internal consistency coefficients.

Perceptual and motor skills·2009
Same author

Differences scores: regression-based reliable difference and the regression-based confidence interval.

Journal of clinical psychology·2009
Same author

A comprehensive approach to the interpretation of difference scores.

Applied neuropsychology·2009
Same author

Statistical approaches to achieving sufficiently high test score reliabilities for research purposes.

The Journal of general psychology·2008
Same journal

Understanding Love in Couple Relationships: A Scoping Review of Sternberg's Triangular Theory.

Psychological reports·2026
Same journal

Psychological Impacts of Instagram Use: The Interplay of Social Comparison, Self-Esteem, and Anxiety.

Psychological reports·2026
Same journal

The Effect of Self-Compassion on Shame in Post-Event Processing.

Psychological reports·2026
Same journal

Tracking Rumination as a Stable Habit (TRASH); Scale Modification and Convergent Validity in a Clinical Sample of Youth With a History of Depression.

Psychological reports·2026
Same journal

Prompting to Practice: Daily Practice Mediates the Benefits of Supplement to a Mindfulness-Based Intervention.

Psychological reports·2026
Same journal

Continued Influence Effect: A Three-Dimensional Framework Shaping Practical and Theoretical Perspectives.

Psychological reports·2026
See all related articles

The Boston Naming Test has unclear scoring instructions, leading to varied interpretations. Different scoring methods significantly impact the final scores, affecting test results.

Area of Science:

  • Neuropsychology
  • Cognitive Assessment
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • The Boston Naming Test (BNT) is a widely used tool for assessing confrontation naming abilities.
  • Ambiguity in the BNT's administration and scoring instructions has been noted.
  • Varied interpretations can affect the reliability and validity of test results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of different interpretations of the Boston Naming Test's scoring instructions.
  • To quantify the differences in total scores resulting from these varied interpretations.

Main Methods:

  • Three distinct, plausible interpretations of the BNT scoring guidelines were applied.
  • The total scores obtained from each interpretation were compared.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Significant discrepancies in total scores were observed across the three scoring interpretations.
  • The variability in scoring methods directly influences the final BNT scores.

Conclusions:

  • The current scoring instructions for the Boston Naming Test are inadequate, leading to potential inconsistencies in assessment.
  • Standardization of scoring procedures is crucial for accurate and reliable evaluation of naming abilities.