Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Advance directives.

C M Culver1

  • 1School of Graduate Medical Sciences, Barry University, 11300 Northeast Second Avenue, Miami Shores, Florida 33161, USA.

Psychology, Public Policy, and Law : an Official Law Review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law
|June 14, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The desirability of a Periscopic quality in correcting lenses.

Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society·2014
Same author

Ask the ethicist: would you tell the patients?

Medical ethics (Burlington, Mass.)·2005
Same author

What information should physicians be required to know?

Newsletter on philosophy and medicine·2004
Same author

Common morality versus specified principlism: reply to Richardson.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2000
Same author

Misreading of bioethics, root and branch.

The Hastings Center report·2000
Same author

Comparison of personnel radiation dosimetry from myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: technetium-99m-sestamibi versus thallium-201.

Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine·1993
Same journal

Difficulties in attorneys' before/after questions in child sexual abuse trials.

Psychology, public policy, and law : an official law review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law·2026
Same journal

Four (and a Half) Preregistered Failures to Replicate the Weapon Focus Effect in Online Samples.

Psychology, public policy, and law : an official law review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law·2025
Same journal

Diversion as a Pathway to Improving Service Utilization Among At-Risk Youth.

Psychology, public policy, and law : an official law review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law·2024
Same journal

The Critical Case File Approach: A Novel Tool for Critically Analyzing Mixed-Method Data as Exemplified in a Juvenile Legal Setting.

Psychology, public policy, and law : an official law review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law·2024
Same journal

Recommendations for the Use of Telepsychology in Psychology-Law Practice and Research: A Statement by American Psychology-Law Society (APA Division 41).

Psychology, public policy, and law : an official law review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law·2024
Same journal

Identification and Incidence of Child Maltreatment During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Psychology, public policy, and law : an official law review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law·2023
See all related articles

Advance directives (ADs) are confusing and ineffective due to overly simplistic or complex forms. This study proposes seven suggestions for improving AD instruments for better clinical outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Health Law
  • Patient Autonomy

Background:

  • Advance directives (ADs) are legal documents outlining patient preferences for future medical treatment.
  • Current AD instruments are widely recognized as having limited positive impact on clinical care.
  • Issues with existing AD forms include oversimplification, narrow focus, or unnecessary complexity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify the shortcomings of current advance directive instruments.
  • To propose improvements for the design of more effective advance directive forms.
  • To critique existing guidelines and reports on advance directives.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of common advance directive instruments and their limitations.
  • Development of recommendations for enhancing advance directive form design.
Keywords:
Death and Euthanasia

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of relevant literature and professional organization reports.

    • Main Results:

    • Current advance directive instruments are often inadequate, contributing to confusion and limited clinical utility.
    • Seven specific suggestions are presented for creating more effective advance directive forms.
    • Existing reports, such as the American Medical Association's, are considered superficial and lacking actionable solutions.

    Conclusions:

    • Improving the design of advance directive instruments is crucial for enhancing their clinical effectiveness.
    • More comprehensive and user-friendly advance directive forms are needed.
    • Further research and practical guidance are required to address the deficiencies in advance directive practice.