Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ocular counterrolling in response to static and dynamic tilting: implications for human otolith function.

Charles H Markham1, Shirley G Diamond

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA. markham@psych.ucsb.edu

Journal of Vestibular Research : Equilibrium & Orientation
|July 18, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Ocular counterrolling (OCR) responses to head tilt were significantly greater during dynamic than static rotation. This suggests the otolith system functions optimally during motion, not static positioning.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Alcohol affects otolith-induced ocular counterrolling: dosage effects.

Acta oto-laryngologica·2008
Same author

The effect of alcohol ingestion on ocular counterrolling.

Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation·2007
Same author

Dynamic pitch rotation affects eye torsion.

Acta oto-laryngologica·2006
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Vestibular System Research
  • Ophthalmology

Background:

  • Ocular counterrolling (OCR) is a vestibulo-ocular reflex crucial for maintaining visual stability during head movements.
  • Understanding OCR responses in different motion conditions is vital for diagnosing vestibular disorders.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare ocular counterrolling (OCR) responses during dynamic versus static head tilting.
  • To investigate potential differences in otolith system function under varying motion conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Nineteen subjects underwent controlled rotation around the naso-occipital axis.
  • Dynamic rotation involved constant velocity (3°/s) and acceleration (0.2°/s²) tilts.
  • Static rotation involved stepwise 1-minute holds at 30°, 60°, and 90° tilts.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • OCR amplitudes were significantly higher during dynamic tilting compared to static tilting.
  • OCR disconjugacy was generally greater in static conditions, but this difference was not statistically significant.
  • Findings suggest a differential response of the otolith system to dynamic versus static stimuli.

Conclusions:

  • The human otolith system exhibits enhanced performance during dynamic head motion compared to static positioning.
  • The observed differences may be attributed to non-uniform otolith membrane movement and amplified hair cell responses during motion.
  • This implies the otolith system is better adapted for processing continuous movement than fixed positions.