Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Understanding and using diagnostic tests.

Virginia A Moyer1, Kathleen A Kennedy

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, UT-Houston Medical School, 6431 Fannin, Suite 2.106, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

Clinics in Perinatology
|July 24, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Expectant Management vs Medication for Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Preterm Infants: The PDA Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA·2025
Same author

Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Extremely Preterm Infants Fed Donor Milk or Preterm Infant Formula: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA·2024
Same author

Tissue Oxygenation Changes After Transfusion and Outcomes in Preterm Infants: A Secondary Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study of the Transfusion of Prematures Randomized Clinical Trial (TOP NIRS).

JAMA network open·2023
Same author

Early brain and abdominal oxygenation in extremely low birth weight infants.

Pediatric research·2022
Same author

Hydrocortisone to Improve Survival without Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia.

The New England journal of medicine·2022
Same author

Initial Laparotomy Versus Peritoneal Drainage in Extremely Low Birthweight Infants With Surgical Necrotizing Enterocolitis or Isolated Intestinal Perforation: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.

Annals of surgery·2021
Same journal

Breathing Physiology into the Art of Neonatal Respiratory Care.

Clinics in perinatology·2026
Same journal

The Science and Art of Neonatal Respiratory Care.

Clinics in perinatology·2026
Same journal

Ex Utero Artificial Womb Support: Promising Future for Extremely Preterm Infants.

Clinics in perinatology·2026
Same journal

Advances in the Use of Cell-Based Therapies for Prevention of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia.

Clinics in perinatology·2026
Same journal

Evaluation and Management of Genetic Respiratory Disorders Presenting as Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in the Newborn Infant.

Clinics in perinatology·2026
Same journal

Modern Surfactant Delivery Methods with a Focus on Implementation of Surfactant Administration Through Laryngeal and Supraglottic Airways.

Clinics in perinatology·2026
See all related articles

Diagnostic tests are valuable when results guide patient care, balancing cost and risk. Test performance, patient risk, and clinical action thresholds determine their utility, especially in screening.

Area of Science:

  • Medical diagnostics
  • Clinical decision-making
  • Health economics

Background:

  • Diagnostic tests incur costs and potential risks.
  • The justification for testing hinges on whether results alter patient management or provide crucial prognostic information.
  • Clinical decisions are influenced by action thresholds, pretest probability, and test performance metrics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the factors determining the utility of diagnostic tests.
  • To explore the trade-offs between test sensitivity and specificity.
  • To evaluate the considerations for implementing screening programs.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the relationship between test performance, clinical action thresholds, and patient pretest probability.
  • Examination of the inverse correlation between sensitivity and specificity in diagnostic tests.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of criteria for introducing screening programs, including test characteristics and disease prevalence.

    • Main Results:

    • Test results justify cost and risk if they change patient management or offer prognostic insights.
    • The utility of a test is contingent upon the action threshold, pretest probability, and test performance (sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios).
    • Screening tests require high performance due to the unacceptability of missed cases and false positives in low-risk populations.

    Conclusions:

    • The value of a diagnostic test is determined by its ability to influence clinical decisions and patient outcomes.
    • Optimizing test performance within clinically relevant ranges is crucial, particularly for screening applications.
    • Implementing screening programs requires a comprehensive assessment of test efficacy, cost, harm potential, and treatment availability.