Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

STD program activity in state policy processes, 1995 and 2000.

Beth E Meyerson1, Bong-Chul Chu, Theresa L Raphael

  • 1Policy Resource Group, LLC, Warrenton, Missouri, USA. bmeyerson@policyresourcegroup.com

Sexually Transmitted Diseases
|August 5, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multilevel Work Environment Factors and Occupational Well-Being Among APRNs Delivering Opioid Use Disorder Treatment: A Multistate Cross-Sectional Study.

Substance use : research and treatment·2026
Same author

Arizona's Naloxone Coprescription Law: Impact on Naloxone Prescriptions for Patients Receiving High-Dose Opioids.

American journal of preventive medicine·2026
Same author

Innovations In Community-Engaged Research.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2025
Same author

Trauma-Related Stress and Resilience in a Multistate Sample of Methadone Treatment Staff.

Substance use : research and treatment·2025
Same author

Access to syringes at pharmacies (ASAP): Preliminary impact of a pharmacy-level intervention.

Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA·2025
Same author

Recruiting opioid treatment program administrators for a national survey: Outcomes and lessons learned.

The International journal on drug policy·2025
Same journal

Sexual Behaviors of Dating Apps Users: A Descriptive Study in French Population.

Sexually transmitted diseases·2026
Same journal

Unknown Duration or Late Syphilis Cases with High Titers - North Carolina, 2015 & 2023.

Sexually transmitted diseases·2026
Same journal

A New Era in Treponema pallidum Cultivation: Current Advances and Future Directions.

Sexually transmitted diseases·2026
Same journal

Advancements in Syphilis Vaccine Development.

Sexually transmitted diseases·2026
Same journal

Potential Strategies for Participation and Community Engagement in Syphilis Clinical Research.

Sexually transmitted diseases·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of Partner Notification Strategies to Improve Syphilis Management in Pregnancy in Blantyre, Malawi: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Sexually transmitted diseases·2026
See all related articles

State sexually transmitted disease (STD) programs are increasingly engaging in policy activities to support prevention efforts. This emerging trend highlights an opportunity to bolster state and local public health initiatives.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health Policy
  • Epidemiology
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • State policy support is vital for effective sexually transmitted disease (STD) prevention.
  • Limited understanding exists regarding the policy engagement of state STD programs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Identify state-level policy activities undertaken by state STD programs.
  • Examine the relationship between policy behaviors and specific state characteristics.

Main Methods:

  • Data collected via a 2001 survey of state STD directors.
  • Policy activities from 1995 and 2000 were analyzed.
  • Compared policy actions with various state characteristics.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Most state STD programs reported policy engagement in both 1995 and 2000.
  • Significant increases were noted in legislative testimony, coalition participation, and information dissemination to policymakers.

    • Conclusions:

    • Observed policy activity suggests a growing capacity for STD directors to influence public policy.
    • There is a clear opportunity to enhance state and local support for STD prevention strategies.