Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Improved protein-ligand docking using GOLD.

Marcel L Verdonk1, Jason C Cole, Michael J Hartshorn

  • 1Astex Technology, Ltd., Cambridge, United Kingdom. m.verdonk@astex-technology.com

Proteins
|August 12, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ligand-Induced Opening of a Cryptic Pocket in METTL14.

ACS bio & med chem Au·2026
Same author

Modeling lipid homeostasis using stable isotope tracing and flux analysis.

Cell metabolism·2026
Same author

Quantifying Molecular Flexibility Using Crystallographically Accessible Conformational Space.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same author

EML4-ALK Variant-Specific Genetic Interactions Shape Lung Tumorigenesis.

Cancer discovery·2025
Same author

Data-Driven Generation of Conformational Ensembles and Ternary Complexes for PROTAC and Other Chimera Systems.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2025
Same author

Prediction of enzyme inhibition (IC<sub>50</sub>) using a combination of protein-ligand docking and semiempirical quantum mechanics.

Journal of molecular modeling·2025
Same journal

Engineered HSP90-MP65 Bivalent Fusion Antigen: A Novel Vaccine Candidate Against Invasive Candidiasis.

Proteins·2026
Same journal

Physics-Based Energy Functions for Computational Protein Design.

Proteins·2026
Same journal

Impact of Stabilizing Osmolytes on the Conformational Dynamics of Human and Rat Islet Amyloid Polypeptides.

Proteins·2026
Same journal

Stabilization of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 at Physiological pH: Contrasting Roles of CHAPS and Arginine in Aggregation Inhibition.

Proteins·2026
Same journal

Structural Insights Into the Function of Leishmania major Adenylosuccinate Lyase.

Proteins·2026
Same journal

Generalizing the Gaussian Network Model: Spanning-Tree Thermodynamics Shows Entropy-Driven KRAS Activation.

Proteins·2026
See all related articles

The Chemscore function, a faster alternative to Goldscore for protein-ligand docking, shows similar accuracy for drug-like and fragment-like compounds. Consensus protocols combining Chemscore and Goldscore significantly improve docking accuracy.

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Molecular modeling
  • Drug discovery

Background:

  • Protein-ligand docking is crucial for identifying drug candidates.
  • Existing scoring functions like Goldscore have limitations in speed and accuracy.
  • Novel scoring functions are needed to optimize virtual screening processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To implement and evaluate the Chemscore function as a scoring function for the GOLD docking program.
  • To compare Chemscore's performance against Goldscore and consensus protocols (Goldscore-CS, Chemscore-GS) in terms of docking accuracy, binding affinity prediction, and speed.
  • To assess the utility of Chemscore and consensus protocols for virtual screening of drug-like and fragment-like compounds.

Main Methods:

  • Implementation of Chemscore within the GOLD docking program.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative analysis of Chemscore, Goldscore, Goldscore-CS, and Chemscore-GS on a dataset of 224 protein-ligand complexes.
  • Evaluation of docking accuracy, binding affinity prediction, and computational speed.
  • Analysis of performance on subsets of drug-like and fragment-like ligands.

    • Main Results:

    • Chemscore and Goldscore exhibit similar docking accuracies for drug-like and fragment-like ligands; Goldscore is superior for larger ligands.
    • Chemscore docking is up to three times faster than Goldscore.
    • Consensus protocols (Goldscore-CS, Chemscore-GS) significantly enhance docking accuracy compared to individual functions.
    • Chemscore-GS offers an optimal balance of speed and accuracy for virtual screening, achieving high success rates.
    • Goldscore provides more accurate binding energy predictions than Chemscore and consensus protocols.

    Conclusions:

    • Chemscore is a viable, faster alternative to Goldscore for certain docking applications.
    • Consensus protocols, particularly Chemscore-GS, represent a significant advancement in docking accuracy and virtual screening efficiency.
    • The choice of scoring function and protocol depends on the specific application, balancing speed, accuracy, and the nature of the ligands being screened.