Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Secondary structure prediction with support vector machines.

J J Ward1, L J McGuffin, B F Buxton

  • 1Department of Computer Science, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|September 12, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Publisher Correction: Brain charts for the human lifespan.

Nature·2022
Same author

Brain charts for the human lifespan.

Nature·2022
Same author

Changes in Ventricular and Cortical Volumes following Shunt Placement in Patients with Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2021
Same author

The final reason paediatric Cardiac ICU patients require care prior to discharge to the floor: a single-centre survey.

Cardiology in the young·2020
Same author

Studies on Clostridium acetobutylicum ginA promoters and antisense RNA.

Molecular microbiology·2017
Same author

Genomic profiling of Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in ataxia telangiectasia patients reveals tight link between ATM mutations and chromothripsis.

Leukemia·2017
Same journal

MCFST: Spatial domain identification method based on multi-view graph convolutional network and graph fusion network.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

SpaBiT: Enhancing Spatial Transcriptomics Resolution via Bidirectional Attention Transformers.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

EDEL: Enhancing Dense Retrievers for Curation of Biomedical Knowledge Bases.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Informative Relational Learning for Adverse Reaction Prediction with Enhanced Generalization to Novel Drugs.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

An interpretable deep learning framework uncovers features governing CRISPR-Cas9 genome-editing efficiency.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

3DICE: Interpretable 3D Cross-Modal Learning for Drug-Target Interaction Prediction and Large-Scale Drug Discovery.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
See all related articles

Support Vector Machines (SVMs) offer a new, reliable method for predicting protein secondary structure. Combining SVMs with other tools like PSIPRED improves prediction accuracy, demonstrating SVMs

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Machine Learning in Structural Biology

Background:

  • Protein secondary structure prediction is crucial for understanding protein function.
  • Existing prediction methods have limitations, necessitating exploration of alternative techniques.
  • Support Vector Machines (SVMs) are a powerful machine learning tool with potential applicability in bioinformatics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a novel method for protein secondary structure prediction using Support Vector Machines (SVMs).
  • To assess the effectiveness of SVMs for multi-class protein structure classification.
  • To investigate the performance of SVMs compared to existing state-of-the-art methods.

Main Methods:

  • Binary SVM classifiers were trained to distinguish between different protein structural classes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Multiple binary classifiers were integrated to predict the three-state secondary structure.
  • Cross-validation was employed to estimate prediction accuracy (Q(3)) and segment overlap (Sov) scores.
  • Main Results:

    • The SVM method achieved an average Q(3) accuracy of 77.07% +/- 0.26% and an Sov score of 73.32% +/- 0.39%.
    • SVM performance was comparable to the PSIPRED method on a diverse, non-homologous protein dataset.
    • A consensus approach combining SVM, PSIPRED, and PROFsec significantly outperformed individual methods.

    Conclusions:

    • SVMs provide a reliable and effective alternative for protein secondary structure prediction.
    • The SVM approach demonstrates strong performance even with limited training data.
    • Ensemble methods incorporating SVMs offer enhanced prediction accuracy, advancing bioinformatics capabilities.