Related Experiment Videos

Vascular access surgery: a 2-year study and comparison with the Permcath

D A Mosquera1, S P Gibson, M D Goldman

  • 1Department of Surgery, East Birmingham Hospital, UK.

Insights

For hemodialysis patients, the Permcath (central venous catheter) shows comparable outcomes to secondary vascular access surgery. It may serve as a primary access option for those with limited life expectancy.

Area of Science:

  • Nephrology
  • Vascular Surgery
  • Medical Devices

Background:

  • Vascular access is crucial for hemodialysis.
  • Traditional surgical options include arteriovenous fistulae and grafts.
  • Central venous catheters (Permcath) offer an alternative access method.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the long-term efficacy and safety of primary/secondary vascular access surgery with central venous catheters (Permcath) for hemodialysis.
  • To evaluate patency rates and complication profiles of different vascular access modalities.

Main Methods:

  • A 2-year prospective study of primary and secondary vascular access surgery.
  • A retrospective study of central venous access using flexible silicone catheters (Permcath).
  • Comparison of cumulative patency and survival rates, alongside complication analysis.

Main Results:

  • Primary fistulae: 64.8% patency at 1 year, 57.7% at 2 years.
  • Secondary procedures: 48.1% patency at 1 and 2 years.
  • Permcath: 74% survival at 1 year, 43% at 2 years; comparable to secondary access, with lower surgical complication rates but risks of infection and bleeding.

Conclusions:

  • Permcath is a viable alternative to secondary vascular access for hemodialysis.
  • Permcath may be considered for primary access in patients with limited life expectancy.
  • Careful monitoring is needed to manage Permcath-related complications like infection and bleeding.

Related Concept Videos