Cell-type-specific adhesion mechanisms mediated by fibronectin adsorbed to chemically derivatized substrata

Plasma fibronectin (pFN) adhesion mechanisms on inert substrata were evaluated for murine fibroblasts (3T3) and human neuroblastoma (Platt) cells using glass coverslips chemically derivatized with a self-assembled monolayer of aliphatic chains terminated with a specific endgroup to interact with adsorbed pFN: [CH3], [SH], [SCOCH3], [NH2], [SO3H], or underivatized glass [SiOH]. All surfaces bound similar amounts of pFN and facilitated attachment of both cell types within narrow ranges. However, spreading/differentiation responses of cells differed considerably among the surfaces. While 3T3 cells spread and developed microfilament stress fibers comparably on all surfaces, inclusion of an RGDS-containing synthetic peptide in the medium revealed variation in resistance to stress fiber formation mediated by an RGDS-recognizing integrin: [NH2] greater than [CH3] much greater than [SiOH],[SH],[SCOCH3]. Different patterns of neurite formation were observed for neuroblastoma cells: [SiOH], [SO3H] greater than [SCOCH3],[SH] much greater than [CH3] greater than [NH2]. Similarity in cell responses to both [CH3] and [NH2] surfaces argues against a pattern dependent upon the hydrophobicity of substrata. When pFN was diluted to a subsaturable concentration with albumin for adsorption, neuroblastoma responses changed significantly from those observed on pFN-saturated surfaces, for both spreading and neurite generation: [NH2],[SO3H] much greater than [SH], [SCOCH3] greater than [SiOH],[CH3]. Responses to the pFN: albumin mixture were markedly improved from responses after sequential adsorptions, demonstrating "optimization" of pFN conformation (not merely binding) by coadsorption of albumin molecules. In most cases, the [NH2] surface yielded responses distinctively different from the other surfaces. Overall, these data suggest many variations in the conformation of pFN molecules adsorbed to specific inert surfaces, as well as variations in the responses of cell surface receptors to conformationally specific pFNs. They also reveal cell-type-specific changes in differentiated cell responses on derivatized substrata, mediated by different classes of cell surface receptors for the two cell types, and provide optimism for regulating FN-dependent adhesion mechanisms in either positive or negative contexts on biomaterial surfaces derivatized with one or more of these chemical end-groups.