Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Discourse influences during parsing are delayed.

K Rayner1, S Garrod, C A Perfetti

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst 01003.

Cognition
|November 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does contextual strength modulate the subordinate bias effect? A reply to Kellas and Vu.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2016
Same author

Neuroanatomical Evidence in Support of the Bilingual Advantage Theory.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2015
Same author

Eye movement control in reading and visual search: Effects of word frequency.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

An independence of mechanism in the origins of reading and classification-related semantic distance effects.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

Visual attention in reading: Eye movements reflect cognitive processes.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same journal

Investigating the origins of partisanship: What motivates children to preferentially endorse their ingroups' claims?

Cognition·2026
Same journal

People make graded judgments about the inconceivable.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

The self as an image: Appearance and belief in visual representations of one's own face.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to 'Consonant, vowel, and tone cues in early wordform recognition: Evidence from Cantonese-learning infants' [Cognition 275 (2026) 106624].

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Identifying distinct sources of whole number interference in children's decimal comparison: the role of numerical magnitude and inhibitory control.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Evidence for abstract spatial concept learning in young animals.

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

Readers often misinterpret sentence structure, experiencing "garden-pathing" even with context. However, focusing on the sentence aids in faster recovery from these parsing errors.

Area of Science:

  • Psycholinguistics
  • Cognitive Science
  • Computational Linguistics

Background:

  • Syntactic ambiguity in sentences poses challenges for readers.
  • Sentence parsing models differ on the role of structural principles versus semantic/pragmatic information.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how readers process syntactically ambiguous sentences.
  • To examine the influence of contextual biasing and discourse focus on sentence parsing.

Main Methods:

  • Eye movements of subjects were tracked while reading ambiguous sentences embedded in biased contexts.
  • Sentences varied in prepositional phrase attachment and reduced relative clause ambiguity.
  • Discourse focus was manipulated as a contextual factor.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Readers frequently encountered parsing difficulties ('garden-pathing') despite biasing context.
  • Discourse focus significantly improved recovery from initial parsing errors.
  • Structural parsing principles appear dominant in initial sentence interpretation.

Conclusions:

  • Initial sentence parsing relies heavily on structural principles.
  • Semantic and pragmatic information influence parsing recovery, not initial interpretation.
  • Discourse focus facilitates more efficient error correction in sentence processing.