Effects of interaural frequency difference on binaural fusion evidenced by electrophysiological versus...

The binaural interaction component (BIC=sum of monaural-true binaural) of the auditory brainstem response appears to reflect central binaural fusion/lateralization processes. Auditory middle-latency responses (AMLRs) are more robust and may reflect more completely such binaural processing. The AMLR also demonstrates such binaural interaction. The fusion of dichotically presented tones with an interaural frequency difference (IFD) offers another test of the extent to which electrophysiological and psychoacoustical measures agree. The effect of IFDs on both the BIC of the AMLR and a psychoacoustical measure of binaural fusion thus were examined. The perception of 20-ms tone bursts at/near 500 Hz with increasing IFDs showed, first, a deviated sound image from the center of the head, followed by clearly separate pitch percepts in each ear. Thresholds of detection of sound deviation and separation (i.e., nonfusion) were found to be 57 and 209 Hz, respectively. However, magnitudes of BICs of the AMLR were found to remain nearly. constant for IFDs up to the 400-Hz (limit of range tested), suggesting that the AMLR-BIC does not provide an objective index of this aspect of binaural processing, at least not under the conditions examined. The nature of lateralization due to IFDs and the concept of critical bands for binaural fusion are also discussed. Further research appears warranted to investigate the significance of the lack of effect of IFDs on the AMLR-BIC. Finally, the IFD paradigm itself would seem useful in that it permits determination of the limit for nonfusion of sounds presented binaurally, a limit not accessible via more conventional paradigms involving interaural time, phase, or intensity differences.