Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 23, 2026

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials
Published on: May 25, 2019
The Effect of Stimulus Intensity and Carrier Frequency on Auditory Middle- and Long-Latency Evoked Potentials Using a
Auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) magnitude increases with stimulus intensity, but findings are disappointing for objective loudness estimation. ASSRs and transient responses show similar patterns regarding intensity, frequency, and gender.
Area of Science:
- Auditory Neuroscience
- Psychoacoustics
Background:
- Auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) and transient responses are used to assess auditory function.
- The relationship between these responses and perceived loudness lacks clear consensus in scientific literature.
Purpose of the Study:
- To measure how auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) and transient auditory evoked potentials change with stimulus intensity and carrier frequency.
- To investigate the relationship between these auditory responses and perceived loudness.
Main Methods:
- ASSRs and transient responses were elicited in 48 normal-hearing adults using tone-burst stimuli at various frequencies and intensities.
- Stimuli were presented at repetition rates of 40 Hz and 0.75 Hz.
- The study also examined potential gender bias in the results.
Main Results:
- ASSR magnitude systematically increased with stimulus intensity, mirroring findings from transient responses.
- The input-output function at 0.75 Hz approximated a log-log linear function, but slopes were lower than predicted by loudness doubling.
- No significant effects of carrier frequency or gender were found for either repetition rate.
Conclusions:
- Stimulus intensity, carrier frequency, and gender affect ASSRs similarly to transient auditory evoked potentials.
- Current findings are insufficient for reliable objective loudness estimation.
- A clear link exists between the 0.75 Hz ASSR magnitude and long-latency responses, but caution is needed when interpreting loudness-related effects.
More Related Videos
09:38Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities
Published on: January 29, 2014
10:50Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
Published on: June 6, 2012