Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Marshall, Mannheim and contested citizenship.

Robert White1, Jed Donoghue

  • 1School of Sociology and Social Work, University of Tasmania.

The British Journal of Sociology
|September 30, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Anomaly Detection for Automated Data Quality Monitoring in the CMS Detector.

EPJ research infrastructures·2026
Same author

Microplastics crossing the blood-testis barrier: A call to action for urological research.

Current urology·2026
Same author

How pro-inflammatory diets influence perioperative outcomes.

Pain management·2025
Same author

The need for more research into health information technology and maternal health outcomes.

Women's health (London, England)·2025
Same author

The rise of Zyn: Implications for anesthesiology and perioperative management.

Journal of clinical anesthesia·2025
Same author

Refining post-cesarean delivery pain management.

Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)·2024
Same journal

Family Rituals in the Hungry Ghost Festival: Spirituality and Multiplex Beliefs in China.

The British journal of sociology·2026
Same journal

Opportunities and Alliances: The Relational Dynamics of Criminal Collusion in Latin America.

The British journal of sociology·2026
Same journal

The Normative Turn: Back to Hobhouse?

The British journal of sociology·2026
Same journal

Subjective Social Inequalities, Lay Perceptions of Merit and Puzzles of Explanation.

The British journal of sociology·2026
Same journal

Criminal Records as Classification Situations.

The British journal of sociology·2026
Same journal

Producing Fraud at the Welfare-Migration Nexus: Migrant Families and Children's Social Care.

The British journal of sociology·2026
See all related articles

This study revisits T.H. Marshall's theory of citizenship rights, highlighting tensions in his model. By integrating Karl Mannheim's thought styles, it offers a new perspective on resolving contradictions in citizenship.

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Political Science
  • Sociology

Background:

  • T.H. Marshall's influential theory outlines the successive emergence of civil, political, and social rights in citizenship.
  • Marshall's account faces tensions related to assumptions of human nature, analytical rationality, and the evolution of his central metaphor.
  • The concept of a 'hyphenated society' reveals co-present, rather than successive, democratic, welfare, and capitalist moments, leading to a pessimistic tone.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address and resolve tensions within T.H. Marshall's account of citizenship rights.
  • To explore the contradictions inherent in Marshall's model by integrating Karl Mannheim's sociological insights.
  • To offer a new framework for understanding the dynamic interplay of different rationalities in shaping citizenship.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of T.H. Marshall's seminal work on citizenship.
  • Integration of Karl Mannheim's early studies on political knowledge and thought styles.
  • Comparative analysis of Marshall's tripartite model with Mannheim's concept of co-present rationalities.

Main Results:

  • Marshall's reliance on a single, modern form of rationality forecloses inherent contradictions in citizenship.
  • Mannheim's framework, particularly his concept of thought styles (liberal, socialist, conservative), offers a resolution to Marshall's impasse.
  • Political change is understood as a dynamic interaction of individually calculating, dialectically collective, and culturally symbolic rationalities.

Conclusions:

  • Revisiting Marshall through Mannheim provides a more nuanced understanding of citizenship.
  • The integration resolves the tension between successive stages and co-present societal moments.
  • This approach illuminates the complex, often contradictory, nature of modern citizenship and political change.