Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Team learning: collectively connecting the dots.

Aleksander P J Ellis1, John R Hollenbeck, Daniel R Ilgen

  • 1Department of Management and Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0108, USA. ellis@eller.arizona.edu

The Journal of Applied Psychology
|October 1, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Understanding the intersection of gender and cognitive ability on interpersonal outcomes: A multistudy investigation.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same author

AI that teaches: an evidence-based GPT model to improve medical student understanding of pulmonary function tests.

Canadian medical education journal·2026
Same author

Empowering Medical Educators Through Innovative Micro-eLearning Design.

Medical science educator·2025
Same author

A practical model of faculty development in medical education: make it accessible, versatile, and easy to use!

Canadian medical education journal·2024
Same author

Understanding the impact of transformational leadership on nurse compassion provision through a time-lagged field study.

Health care management review·2023
Same author

Tracheotomy in Croup.

Atlanta medical and surgical journal·2022
Same journal

Grateful leaders and attentive followers: How grateful attention transmits the cascade of gratitude expressions to strengthen coworker relationships.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same journal

Scoring employment interviews with large language models: Evaluation design components, validity investigations, and best practice recommendations.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same journal

A profile analysis of leader interpersonal emotion management strategies.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same journal

A choice architecture intervention to increase diversity: Diverse defaults can counteract hiring discrimination.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same journal

Transformational leadership in context: A meta-analysis of 40 years of research.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same journal

Organizations espousing an authenticity ideology repel stigmatized job seekers.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
See all related articles

Team learning is enhanced by high cognitive ability and even workload distribution. However, high Agreeableness in team members hinders learning, while a paired structure benefits it most.

Area of Science:

  • Organizational Psychology
  • Team Dynamics
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Understanding factors influencing team learning is crucial for optimizing collaborative performance.
  • Existing literature highlights attentional capacity, constructive controversy, and truth-supported wins as relevant concepts.
  • Personal and situational variables require further investigation regarding their impact on knowledge and skill acquisition in teams.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of personal (cognitive ability, Agreeableness, Openness to Experience) and situational (workload distribution, team structure) variables on team learning.
  • To extend existing theories by examining specific factors within interactive project team settings.
  • To identify key determinants of effective team learning in complex tasks.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized a sample of 109 four-person project teams engaged in an interdependent command and control simulator task.
  • Assessed individual characteristics including cognitive ability, Agreeableness, and Openness to Experience.
  • Manipulated or measured workload distribution and team structure (paired, functional, divisional).

Main Results:

  • Team learning was positively correlated with higher individual cognitive ability and equitable workload distribution.
  • Conversely, team learning was negatively impacted when team members scored high on Agreeableness.
  • Teams structured in a paired configuration demonstrated superior learning outcomes compared to functional or divisional structures.

Conclusions:

  • Cognitive ability and workload distribution are significant positive predictors of team learning.
  • High levels of Agreeableness within a team can impede the learning process.
  • A paired team structure appears most conducive to enhancing knowledge and skill acquisition in project teams.