Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
Team learning: collectively connecting the dots
Aleksander P J Ellis1, John R Hollenbeck, Daniel R Ilgen
1Department of Management and Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0108, USA. ellis@eller.arizona.edu
Abstract:
This article tests the degree to which personal and situational variables impact the acquisition of knowledge and skill within interactive project teams. On the basis of the literature regarding attentional capacity, constructive controversy, and truth-supported wins, the authors examined the effects of cognitive ability, workload distribution, Agreeableness, Openness to Experience, and structure on team learning. Results from 109 four-person project teams working on an interdependent command and control simulator indicated that teams learned more when composed of individuals who were high in cognitive ability and when the workload was distributed evenly. Conversely, team learning was negatively affected when teams were composed of individuals who were high in Agreeableness. Finally, teams using a paired structure learned more than teams structured either functionally or divisionally. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed, as well as possible limitations and directions for future research.
Related Concept Videos
Social Loafing
Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Problem Solving
A small car of mass 1,200 kg traveling east at 60 km/h collides at an intersection with a truck of mass 3,000 kg traveling due north at 40 km/h. The two vehicles are locked together. What is the...
Dot Product: Problem Solving
Identify the problem: Start by reading the problem and...
Associative Learning
Classical conditioning, also known...
Method of Joints: Problem Solving II
Method of Joints: Problem Solving I

