Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2026

Translational Rabbit Model of Chronic Cardiac Pacing
Published on: January 6, 2023
Long-term complication rates in ventricular, single lead VDD, and dual chamber pacing
Uwe K H Wiegand1, Frank Bode, Hendrik Bonnemeier
1University of Lübeck, Medizinische Klinik II, Lübeck, Germany. uwe.weigand@MEDINF.MU-LUEBECK.DE
Insights
Single lead VDD pacemakers may reduce complications in patients with AV block. VDD pacing offers complication rates comparable to VVI systems, with reduced operation times compared to DDD devices.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Dual-chamber (DDD) pacemaker systems report higher complication rates than single-chamber (VVI) devices.
- Atrioventricular (AV) block necessitates pacing, with various device types offering different physiological pacing capabilities.
- Pacemaker-related complications and procedural times are critical factors in device selection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare complication rates and procedural times of VDD, DDD, and VVI pacemaker implantations in patients with AV block.
- To evaluate the efficacy of single-lead VDD pacing in reducing complications associated with physiological pacing.
- To determine if VDD pacing offers an advantage over DDD and VVI systems in terms of safety and efficiency.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 1,214 patients with AV block undergoing pacemaker implantation between 1990 and 2001.
- Comparison of surgical intervention rates and procedural times (operation and fluoroscopy) across VVI, DDD, and VDD pacing groups.
- Multivariate Cox regression analysis to assess corrected complication hazards for different pacing systems.
Main Results:
- DDD pacemaker implantation showed significantly longer operation and fluoroscopic times compared to VDD and VVI devices.
- The corrected complication hazard was 3.9 times higher for DDD pacing versus VVI and 2.3 times higher versus VDD.
- Higher DDD complication rates were primarily due to early atrial lead dysfunction; long-term rates did not differ between VDD, VVI, and DDD.
- No significant difference in early or long-term complication rates was observed between VDD and VVI pacemaker systems.
Conclusions:
- Single-lead VDD pacemaker implantation reduces operation time and complication rates for physiological pacing.
- VDD pacing achieves complication rates comparable to VVI pacing.
- Single-lead VDD pacing is a recommended option for patients with AV block, offering benefits over DDD systems.
Abstract:
A higher incidence of pacemaker related complications has been reported in DDD systems as compared to VVI devices. The implantation of single lead VDD pacemakers might reduce the complication rate of physiological pacing in patients with AV block. In a retrospective study, the data records of 1,214 consecutive patients with pacemaker implantation for AV block between 1990 and 2001 (VVI 36.5%, DDD 32.9%, VDD 30.6%) were analyzed. Complications requiring surgical interventions were compared during a follow-up period of 64 +/- 31 months. Operation and fluoroscopic times were longer in DDD pacemaker implantation compared to VDD and VVI devices:58 +/- 23 versus 39 +/- 10 and 37 +/- 13 minutes (P<0.001), 9.2 +/- 5.2 versus 4.1 +/- 2.4 and 3.5 +/- 2.3 minutes, respectively. Differences remained significant after correction for covariates. In a multivariate Cox regression model, the corrected complication hazard of a DDD pacemaker implantation was increased by 3.9 (1.4-11.3) compared to VVI and increased by 2.3 (1.1-4.5) compared to VDD pacing. Higher complication rates in DDD pacing were mainly due to a higher incidence of early reoperation for atrial lead dysfunction, whereas the long-term complication rate was not different from VDD or VVI pacing. Early and long-term complication rates did not differ between VDD and VVI pacemaker systems. In conclusion, operation time and complication rates of physiological pacing are reduced by VDD pacemaker implantation achieving values comparable to VVI pacing. Thus, single lead VDD pacing can be recommended for patients with AV block.
More Related Videos
16:40A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac muscle...