Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A relevant universal coverage proposal.

Jeff Lemieux1

  • 1Progressive Policy Institute, Washington, DC, USA.

Health Affairs (Project Hope)
|October 7, 2003
PubMed
Summary

This analysis critiques a universal coverage proposal, identifying logical shortcomings that hinder political consensus. It suggests improvements like passthrough tax credits and addressing provider accountability for better healthcare reform.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Trends in inpatient hospital prices, 2008 to 2010.

The American journal of managed care·2013
Same author

Hospital readmission rates in Medicare Advantage plans.

The American journal of managed care·2012
Same author

Medicare Advantage Chronic Special Needs Plan boosted primary care, reduced hospital use among diabetes patients.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2012
Same author

Medigap coverage and Medicare spending: a second look.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2008

Area of Science:

  • Health Policy
  • Healthcare Economics
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Universal coverage proposals aim to overcome ideological divides in healthcare reform.
  • Previous strategies have faced political obstacles, limiting progress.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate a specific universal coverage proposal by Davis and Schoen.
  • To identify logical shortcomings that may impede political agreement.
  • To propose incremental technical improvements for the proposal.

Main Methods:

  • Review of the strategic vision for universal coverage.
  • Analysis of the proposal's logical structure and potential political impact.
  • Formulation of specific recommendations for enhancement.

Main Results:

  • The proposal, while strategic, contains specific logical flaws that could prevent political consensus.
  • Tax credits could be more effectively administered as a government passthrough via employers.
  • Provider accountability and patient information needs require more direct attention.

Conclusions:

  • The proposal needs refinement to achieve broader political acceptance.
  • Implementing passthrough tax credits and enhancing provider accountability are key recommendations.
  • Addressing patient information needs is crucial for effective healthcare reform.

Related Experiment Videos