Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Multifetal pregnancy reduction and selective termination.

Melissa C Bush1, Keith A Eddleman

  • 1Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 5 East 98th Street, Box 1171, New York, NY 10029, USA.

Clinics in Perinatology
|October 10, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Circulating Cell-Free DNA to Determine the Fetal RHD Status in All Three Trimesters of Pregnancy.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2016
Same author

Detection of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity by analysis of cervicovaginal proteins in women with preterm labor and intact membranes.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2015
Same author

Timing of and outcomes after selective termination of anomalous fetuses in dichorionic twin pregnancies.

Prenatal diagnosis·2014
Same author

Diagnosis and management of neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia in pregnancy.

Clinics in laboratory medicine·2013
Same author

8p23.1 duplication syndrome; common, confirmed, and novel features in six further patients.

American journal of medical genetics. Part A·2013
Same author

Women's attitudes regarding mode of delivery and cesarean delivery on maternal request.

The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians·2011
Same journal

Breathing Physiology into the Art of Neonatal Respiratory Care.

Clinics in perinatology·2026
Same journal

The Science and Art of Neonatal Respiratory Care.

Clinics in perinatology·2026
Same journal

Ex Utero Artificial Womb Support: Promising Future for Extremely Preterm Infants.

Clinics in perinatology·2026
Same journal

Advances in the Use of Cell-Based Therapies for Prevention of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia.

Clinics in perinatology·2026
Same journal

Evaluation and Management of Genetic Respiratory Disorders Presenting as Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in the Newborn Infant.

Clinics in perinatology·2026
Same journal

Modern Surfactant Delivery Methods with a Focus on Implementation of Surfactant Administration Through Laryngeal and Supraglottic Airways.

Clinics in perinatology·2026
See all related articles

Multifetal pregnancy reduction (MPR) and selective termination (ST) are safe procedures for multifetal pregnancies, but outcomes depend on experienced centers and strict protocols. Further research into ethical and psychological aspects is needed.

Area of Science:

  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics

Background:

  • Multifetal pregnancies present unique challenges and risks.
  • Selective termination (ST) and multifetal pregnancy reduction (MPR) are established procedures for managing high-order multifetal gestations.
  • These procedures aim to improve pregnancy outcomes by reducing the number of fetuses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of MPR and ST procedures in managing multifetal pregnancies.
  • To assess pregnancy loss rates and gestational ages at delivery following these interventions.
  • To highlight the importance of specialized centers and experienced operators for optimal outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Review of outcomes from centers with extensive experience in performing MPR and ST.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of pregnancy loss rates and gestational ages at delivery.
  • Consideration of ethical and psychological factors in patient counseling and follow-up.

    • Main Results:

    • MPR and ST procedures demonstrate technical safety.
    • Acceptable pregnancy loss rates and gestational ages at delivery were observed in experienced centers.
    • Outcomes are strongly associated with a limited number of operators adhering to strict protocols.

    Conclusions:

    • MPR and ST are viable options for multifetal pregnancies when performed in highly experienced centers with standardized protocols.
    • Generalization of these positive outcomes to less experienced centers is not advisable.
    • Further investigation into the ethical and psychological dimensions of these procedures is warranted.
    • Advances in assisted reproductive technology (ART) may reduce the future need for MPR.