Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research
Timothy A Judge1, Ronald F Piccolo, Remus Ilies
1Department of Management, Warrington College of Business, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. timothy.judge@cba.ufl.edu
Abstract:
This study provided a meta-analysis of the relationship of the Ohio State leadership behaviors--Consideration and Initiating Structure--with leadership. Overall, 163 independent correlations for Consideration and 159 correlations for Initiating Structure were analyzed. Results revealed that both Consideration (.48) and Initiating Structure (.29) have moderately strong, nonzero relations with leadership outcomes. Consideration was more strongly related to follower satisfaction (leader satisfaction, job satisfaction), motivation, and leader effectiveness, and Initiating Structure was slightly more strongly related to leader job performance and group-organization performance. Validities did vary by leadership measure, but in most cases validities generalized regardless of the measure used. Overall, the results provide important support for the validity of Initiating Structure and Consideration in leadership research.
Related Concept Videos
Impact of Individuals on a Group
Implicit Personality Theories
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
Cognitive Dissonance
Social Loafing
Reason and Intuition