Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Assessment of protein coding measures.

J W Fickett1, C S Tung

  • 1Theoretical Biology and Biophysics Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, NM 87545.

Nucleic Acids Research
|December 25, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rapid versus standard testing for prenatal HIV screening in a predominantly Hispanic population.

Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2009
Same author

Linking molecular and bedside research: designing a clinical research infrastructure.

Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany)·2002
Same author

Changes in the performance of schedule-induced polydipsia (SIP) in rats after arecoline and amphetamine treatments.

Proceedings of the National Science Council, Republic of China. Part B, Life sciences·2001
Same author

A standard reference frame for the description of nucleic acid base-pair geometry.

Journal of molecular biology·2001
Same author

Siderophore mediated plutonium accumulation by Microbacterium flavescens (JG-9).

Environmental science & technology·2001
Same author

DNA-XPA interactions: a (31)P NMR and molecular modeling study of dCCAATAACC association with the minimal DNA-binding domain (M98-F219) of the nucleotide excision repair protein XPA.

Nucleic acids research·2001
Same journal

Correction to 'scSuperAnnotator: A platform for benchmarking comparison and visualizing automated cellular annotation methods for scRNA-seq data'.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

Correction to 'Differentiable partition function calculation for RNA'.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

Deployment of non-canonical splicing in tunicate genomes is mediated by divergent U2AF function and changing m6A modification in U1 and U6 snRNA.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

Bacillus subtilis DnaB forms multiple protein-protein interactions essential for DNA replication initiation.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

Multiple forms of protein-protein and DNA binding are exhibited by BrxC from the BREX phage restriction system.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

Biosynthesis of glycosylated 5-hydroxycytosine in the DNA of diverse viruses.

Nucleic acids research·2026
See all related articles

A review of protein-coding gene recognition methods found that simple oligomer counting is more effective than complex algorithms. Future gene discovery can focus on a select few measures for optimization.

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Numerous methods for identifying protein-coding genes in DNA sequences have been developed over the past 13 years.
  • Ongoing development of gene recognition algorithms necessitates systematic evaluation of existing techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and synthesize coding measures used in published gene recognition algorithms.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of various coding measures using a standardized benchmark.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review and synthesis of coding measures from published gene recognition algorithms.
  • Development and application of a standardized benchmark for evaluating coding measures.
  • Comparative analysis of different coding measures' performance.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A simple measure, counting oligomers, demonstrated superior effectiveness compared to more sophisticated measures.
  • Significant redundancy exists among the currently employed coding measures.
  • Different measures capture distinct types of information relevant to gene recognition.

Conclusions:

  • Future development of gene recognition algorithms can likely be optimized by focusing on a limited set of approximately six key measures.
  • The effectiveness of oligomer counting suggests its importance in future gene discovery efforts.