Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

High-resolution scanning electron microscopy.

D C Joy1, J B Pawley

  • 1EM Facility, University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996-0810.

Ultramicroscopy
|November 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Biological serial block face scanning electron microscopy at improved z-resolution based on Monte Carlo model.

Scientific reports·2018
Same author

Effects of molecular entanglements during electrospray of high molecular weight polymers.

Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry·2016
Same author

Monte Carlo modeling of ion beam induced secondary electrons.

Ultramicroscopy·2016
Same author

Characterization of hydrogen responsive nanoporous palladium films synthesized via a spontaneous galvanic displacement reaction.

Nanotechnology·2012
Same author

Diverse and conserved nano- and mesoscale structures of diatom silica revealed by atomic force microscopy.

Journal of microscopy·2009
Same author

Special issue in honor of Professor D.B. Holt.

Scanning·2008
Same journal

Unsupervised deep image prior for sparse-view and limited-angle electron tomography.

Ultramicroscopy·2026
Same journal

Determination of the structure of the tertiary phase in the alloy Al<sub>10</sub>Mo<sub>10</sub>Nb<sub>10</sub>Ta<sub>10</sub>Ti<sub>30</sub>Zr<sub>30</sub> using convergent beam electron diffraction.

Ultramicroscopy·2026
Same journal

Predictive drift compensation of multi-frame STEM via live scan modification.

Ultramicroscopy·2026
Same journal

Deep PACBED: Multitask analysis of PACBED images using deep neural networks.

Ultramicroscopy·2026
Same journal

Guided progressive reconstructive imaging: A new quantization-based framework for low-dose, high-throughput and real-time analytical ptychography.

Ultramicroscopy·2026
Same journal

Brightness optimization in a 200 keV DTEM source by geometry-driven aberration suppression.

Ultramicroscopy·2026
See all related articles

Scanning electron microscopes (SEM) achieve 1 nm resolution by optimizing electron probe size and minimizing specimen damage. Beam energies of 1-3 keV offer the best performance and lowest radiation impact.

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Physics
  • Microscopy

Background:

  • Spatial resolution in Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) is constrained by electron probe diameter, beam/specimen interaction volume, and signal detection statistics.
  • Practical high-resolution SEM performance necessitates understanding image contrast and specimen radiation sensitivity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify key factors limiting spatial resolution in SEM.
  • To determine optimal operating conditions for achieving high resolution with minimal specimen damage.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of factors limiting spatial resolution: electron probe diameter, beam/specimen interaction volume, and signal statistics.
  • Evaluation of contrast mechanisms and specimen radiation sensitivity for high-resolution imaging.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Investigation of beam energies for optimal performance and minimal radiation damage.

    • Main Results:

    • State-of-the-art electron optics enable resolutions around 1 nm.
    • Optimal conditions for 1 nm resolution with minimal specimen damage occur at beam energies of 1-3 keV.
    • Further resolution improvements may be limited by secondary electron (SE) production delocalization and electron-optical performance limits.

    Conclusions:

    • Achieving sub-nanometer resolution in SEM is feasible with current technology.
    • Low beam energies (1-3 keV) are crucial for balancing high resolution and specimen preservation.
    • Fundamental physical limits related to electron interactions and optics may constrain future resolution gains.