Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Lumbosacral nerve root stimulation comparing electrical with surface magnetic coil techniques.

R A Macdonell1, D Cros, B T Shahani

  • 1Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Muscle & Nerve
|August 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary

Needle electrode stimulation of lumbosacral nerve roots yielded larger compound muscle action potential amplitudes than magnetic stimulation. This suggests needle electrodes are more suitable for lumbosacral nerve root stimulation studies.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Functional electrical stimulation to the affected lower limb and recovery after cerebral infarction.

Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association·2015
Same author

Modeling additive and non-additive effects in a hybrid population using genome-wide genotyping: prediction accuracy implications.

Heredity·2015
Same author

Survival of Coelaenomenodera lameensis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in Relation to the Physical Characteristics of Different Oil Palm (Elaeis sp.) Breeding Populations.

Journal of insect science (Online)·2015
Same author

Rigorous analysis of highly tunable cylindrical transverse magnetic mode re-entrant cavities.

The Review of scientific instruments·2014
Same author

Improving palm oil quality through identification and mapping of the lipase gene causing oil deterioration.

Nature communications·2013
Same author

Precise phase synchronization of a cryogenic microwave oscillator.

The Review of scientific instruments·2010

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Clinical Electrophysiology

Background:

  • Accurate stimulation of lumbosacral nerve roots is crucial for electrodiagnostic studies.
  • Comparing monopolar needle electrode stimulation with magnetic stimulation is important for optimizing techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of monopolar needle electrode stimulation versus magnetic stimulation for lumbosacral nerve roots.
  • To evaluate compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitudes and latencies elicited by both stimulation methods.

Main Methods:

  • Compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) were recorded from tibialis anterior (TA) and flexor hallucis brevis (FHB) muscles.
  • Stimulation was performed using a monopolar needle electrode and a 7-cm diameter surface coil for magnetic stimulation.
  • F-wave latencies were analyzed to estimate the site of nerve root stimulation.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Mean CMAP latencies did not differ significantly between needle and magnetic stimulation.
  • Needle stimulation produced considerably larger CMAP amplitudes (66% for TA, 64% for FHB) compared to magnetic stimulation (36% for TA, 25% for FHB) relative to the direct M response.
  • Both methods appeared to stimulate nerve roots proximal to the intervertebral foramen on average, despite individual variability.

Conclusions:

  • Monopolar needle electrode stimulation is a more suitable technique for stimulating lumbosacral nerve roots compared to magnetic stimulation.
  • Needle electrodes offer superior amplitude responses, enhancing their utility in clinical electrophysiology.