Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Alternative statistical techniques to evaluate linearity.

D W Tholen1

  • 1College of American Pathologists, Traverse City, Mich.

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
|July 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary

This review examines various linearity assessment methods in laboratory diagnostics, highlighting that no single technique is universally optimal. Different approaches offer unique strengths and limitations for evaluating diagnostic test performance.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The usefulness of calibration verification and linearity surveys in predicting acceptable performance in graded proficiency tests.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·1995
Same author

Reference values and participant means as targets in proficiency testing.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·1993
Same author

Proficiency testing of enzymes. Charting the way toward standardization.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·1988
Same author

A nonparametric analysis method for evaluation of survey results. Application to ligand assay survey.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·1988
Same author

Multiprogram characterization of laboratory bias, precision, and total error. Proposal for improved assessment with shared external and expanded internal (regional) quality control pools.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·1988
Same author

A statistical procedure for measuring and evaluating performance in interlaboratory comparison programs.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·1988

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Laboratory Science
  • Diagnostic Method Validation

Background:

  • Increasing demand for linearity assessment in diagnostic methods.
  • Lack of consensus on optimal linearity assessment techniques.
  • Existing guidelines from College of American Pathologists, National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, and manufacturers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and categorize different approaches to linearity assessment.
  • To discuss the strengths and limitations of various linearity assessment methods.
  • To provide an overview of techniques beyond a comprehensive statistical review.

Main Methods:

  • Categorization of linearity assessment methods into four basic approaches.
  • Discussion of visual review as the simplest method.
  • Explanation of least-squares regression, slope comparisons (deltas), and observed vs. expected value comparisons.

Main Results:

  • Four primary categories of linearity assessment methods identified: visual, least-squares regression, slope comparison, and observed/expected value comparison.
  • Each method category presents distinct advantages in terms of intuitiveness, statistical rigor, and objectivity.
  • Limitations of each approach are not always apparent and require careful consideration.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of linearity assessment method depends on specific needs and desired rigor.
  • Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each approach is crucial for accurate diagnostic method validation.
  • Further research may be needed to establish consensus on optimal linearity assessment strategies.

Related Experiment Videos