Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing categorization models.

Jeffrey N Rouder1, Roger Ratcliff

  • 1Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO, US. jeff@banta.psyc.missouri.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|February 26, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing qualitative individual differences with Bayesian hierarchical latent-mixture models.

Psychological methods·2026
Same author

Random-effects psychophysics for studying individual differences in perception and cognition.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Estimating correlations across tasks in experimental psychology.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

The role of reliability in experiments.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2026
Same author

The interplay between selective attention and summary statistics.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2025
Same author

Localizing structure in individual differences: A visual illusion case study.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same journal

Executive function and social behavior: Causal evidence from loading working memory and inhibitory control.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Your research is public engagement: A case for more intentional science communication in research with human subjects" by Vaughn (2026).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Costs and benefits of acting extraverted: A randomized controlled trial" by Jacques-Hamilton et al. (2019).

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Conveying (discrete) emotionality with novel words.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

Physical actions shape moral choices: Environment-directed movements reduce cheating in young children.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same journal

From chunks to schemas: Learning in the Hebb repetition paradigm.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
See all related articles

This study compared rule-based and exemplar-based models of human categorization. Findings indicate that stimulus confusability influences whether rule-based or exemplar-based processes are used in categorization tasks.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Behavior
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Human categorization is often explained by rule-based or exemplar-based models.
  • Understanding the underlying mechanisms of categorization is crucial for cognitive science.
  • Previous models offered competing explanations for categorization behavior.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To competitively test rule- and exemplar-based models of human categorization.
  • To investigate the role of stimulus properties in determining categorization strategy.
  • To evaluate the predictive power of General Recognition Theory and Generalized Context Model.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted four experiments involving probabilistic stimulus classification.
  • Manipulated stimulus assignment probabilities to create confusable and distinct stimuli.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Compared model predictions against empirical data from human participants.

    • Main Results:

    • Rule-based General Recognition Theory outperformed the exemplar-based Generalized Context Model for confusable stimuli.
    • Generalized Context Model provided a better account for distinct and few stimuli.
    • Stimulus confusability was identified as a key factor in mediating categorization processes.

    Conclusions:

    • Categorization behavior is not solely governed by one type of model.
    • Multiple process accounts of categorization are supported by these findings.
    • The degree of stimulus confusion significantly impacts the cognitive strategies employed during categorization.