Related Experiment Videos
Emotion-related regulation: sharpening the definition.
Nancy Eisenberg1, Tracy L Spinrad
1Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1104, USA. nancy.eisenberg@asu.edu
Child Development
|April 2, 2004
Summary
This study refines the definition of emotion regulation, distinguishing it from external influences and clarifying distinctions between self-regulation, goal-oriented behavior, and voluntary control for better research.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
- Social Psychology
Background:
- The construct of emotion regulation is crucial in developmental and social psychology.
- Existing definitions of emotion regulation may lack specificity, potentially encompassing broader phenomena.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate the definition of emotion regulation proposed by Cole, Martin, and Dennis.
- To propose a more precise definition of emotion-related self-regulation.
- To differentiate key aspects of emotion regulation.
Main Methods:
- Conceptual analysis of the definition of emotion regulation.
- Distinguishing between internal and external regulation.
- Differentiating goal-oriented vs. unintentional behavior.
- Differentiating voluntary vs. less voluntary control.
Main Results:
- The definition of emotion regulation by Cole et al. is considered too encompassing.
- Essential distinctions include: self-regulation vs. external regulation, goal-oriented vs. unintentional behavior, and voluntary vs. less voluntary control.
- An alternative definition of emotion-related self-regulation is proposed.
Conclusions:
- A refined definition of emotion regulation is necessary for clearer conceptualization and research.
- Differentiating internal, goal-oriented, and voluntary aspects enhances the understanding of self-regulation.
- The proposed alternate definition offers a more focused approach to studying emotion regulation.