Related Experiment Videos
Comparison of algorithms for tracking short-term changes in arterial circulation parameters
G Avanzolini1, P Barbini, A Cappello
1Dipartimento di Elettronnica, Informatica e Sistemistica, University of Bologna, Italy.
IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering
|August 1, 1992
Summary
Three recursive methods effectively track rapid changes in arterial viscoelastic properties. The least squares with variable forgetting factor (LSVF) method balances performance and efficiency, while the constant forgetting factor and covariance modification (CFCM) algorithm excels in noisy conditions.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- System Identification
- Physiology
Background:
- The systemic arterial bed exhibits complex viscoelastic properties.
- Accurate tracking of these properties is crucial for understanding cardiovascular dynamics.
- Rapid parameter changes in biological systems pose identification challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate three recursive methods for tracking rapidly changing viscoelastic properties of the systemic arterial bed.
- To compare the performance and efficiency of Recursive Least Squares (RLS), Least Squares with Variable Forgetting Factor (LSVF), and a Constant Forgetting Factor with Covariance Modification (CFCM) algorithms.
- To assess the sensitivity of these methods to design variables using simulated noisy data.
Main Methods:
- Application of RLS, LSVF, and CFCM algorithms within a unified framework.
- System identification of viscoelastic properties using noisy computer simulation data.
- Investigation of parameter sensitivity and tracking accuracy for each method.
Main Results:
- All analyzed methods demonstrated satisfactory tracking of rapid changes in peripheral resistance.
- LSVF offered slightly better performance than RLS and is suitable when calculation efficiency is prioritized.
- CFCM exhibited the best tracking ability, even with varying noise sequences, while maintaining simplicity.
Conclusions:
- Recursive methods, particularly LSVF and CFCM, are effective for identifying systems with rapidly changing parameters like the arterial bed.
- LSVF provides a good balance between performance and computational efficiency.
- CFCM demonstrates superior tracking performance in the presence of noise, making it a robust choice for complex physiological systems.