Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

11:25
Multi-step Preparation Technique to Recover Multiple Metabolite Compound Classes for In-depth and Informative Metabolomic Analysis
Published on: July 11, 2014
Drug testing for multiemployer plans: choosing the proper legal structure
1Michael Best & Friedrich, LLP, Milwaukee, USA.
Summary
Funding employee drug testing programs within multiemployer funds presents legal challenges. This article examines funding structures like health and welfare funds, highlighting potential risks for plan administrators.
Area of Science:
- Labor relations
- Employee benefits law
- Occupational health
Background:
- Multiemployer funds are common in various industries.
- Employee drug testing is increasingly implemented for workplace safety.
- Funding mechanisms for such programs require careful legal consideration.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the legal implications of funding employee drug testing programs in multiemployer contexts.
- To explore the suitability of different fund structures for supporting drug testing initiatives.
- To identify potential legal risks associated with inadequate funding strategies.
Main Methods:
- Legal analysis of relevant statutes and case law.
- Examination of common multiemployer fund structures (health and welfare, apprenticeship, labor-management cooperation).
- Identification of potential liabilities and compliance issues.
Main Results:
- Health and welfare funds may offer a viable funding source, but require careful structuring to comply with ERISA and other regulations.
- Apprenticeship and training funds may have limitations on using funds for drug testing.
- Labor-management cooperation committees might face challenges in direct funding due to their governance structure.
Conclusions:
- Properly structuring the funding of employee drug testing is crucial to mitigate legal risks for plan administrators.
- Choosing the appropriate fund entity requires a thorough understanding of legal constraints and governance.
- Proactive legal review is essential before implementing a drug testing funding plan.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Comparison Tests
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Sampling Plans
Sampling is a crucial step in analytical chemistry, allowing researchers to collect representative data from a large population. Common sampling methods include random, judgmental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling.
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Actuarial Approach
The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...

