Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2026

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Five-year follow up of the ATS mechanical heart valve
Robert W Emery1, Christopher C Krogh, Deb J Jones
1Cardiac Surgical Associates, P. A., St. Paul, MN 55114, USA. dremery@csa-heart.com
Insights
The ATS mechanical prosthesis shows excellent intermediate-term results for aortic and mitral valve replacement, with low rates of valve-related complications and mortality. Further long-term follow-up is recommended for these cardiac surgery devices.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
- Prosthetic Heart Valves
Background:
- Study evaluated 342 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) or mitral valve replacement (MVR) with the ATS Medical prosthesis between 1997-2001.
- Initial phase conducted under FDA investigational device exemption.
- Objective was to determine valve-related event incidence and patient-reported noise disturbance up to five years post-implantation.
Purpose of the Study:
- Assess the safety and efficacy of the ATS Medical prosthesis in AVR and MVR procedures.
- Determine the incidence of valve-related complications, including mortality, thromboembolism, bleeding, and reoperation.
- Evaluate patient experience regarding prosthetic valve noise.
Main Methods:
- Consecutive enrollment of patients undergoing AVR or MVR with the ATS prosthesis.
- Follow-up conducted via patient questionnaires and telephone calls, achieving 96% completeness.
- Data collected over 878 patient-years, with specific follow-up for AVR (613 pt-yr) and MVR (265 pt-yr) groups.
Main Results:
- Overall operative mortality was 2.6% (AVR 3.2%, MVR 1.0%), with 0.6% valve-related deaths.
- Late valve-related complications included major bleeding (1.8%/pt-yr for AVR, 2.3%/pt-yr for MVR), neuroembolic events (0.7%/pt-yr for AVR, 0.4%/pt-yr for MVR), and paravalvular leaks.
- Reoperation was required in 0.2%/pt-yr for AVR (paravalvular leak) and 0.4%/pt-yr for MVR (thrombosis).
Conclusions:
- Intermediate-term outcomes with the ATS mechanical prosthesis in AVR and MVR are excellent.
- Low rates of operative mortality and valve-related complications were observed.
- Further long-term follow-up is necessary to fully assess the durability and safety of the prosthesis.
Background And Aim Of The Study:
Between January 1, 1997 and December 31, 2001, a total of 342 patients underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) or mitral valve replacement (MVR) with the ATS Medical prosthesis. The initial three-year phase of this study took place under a United States Food and Drug Administration-approved investigational device exemption study. The study aim was to determine the incidence of valve-related events in up to five years of follow up after valve implantation, and to assess patient disturbance from valve noise.
Methods:
Patients were consecutively enrolled to undergo AVR or MVR with the ATS prosthesis. Follow up studies were conducted by patient questionnaire and/or telephone call. Follow up was 96% complete. AVR was conducted in 246 patients (80 with coronary bypass), and MVR in 96 patients (29 with coronary bypass).
Results:
The overall operative mortality was 2.6% (n = 9; AVR 3.2%, n = 8; MVR 1.0%, n = 1), with two deaths being valve-related (0.6%). In 878 patient-years (pt-yr) of follow up (613 pt-yr for AVR; 265 pt-yr for MVR) there were an additional 22 deaths. Five deaths (0.6%/pt-yr) were valve-related: two were neuroembolic (both MVR), one from endocarditis (AVR), and two from bleeding events (both AVR). Late valve-related complications (>30 days) included 17 episodes of major bleeding (11 AVR, 1.8%/pt-yr; six MVR, 2.3%/pt-yr), five permanent neuroembolic events (four AVR, 0.7%/pt-yr; one MVR, 0.4%/pt-yr); 16 transient neuroembolic events (10 AVR, 1.6%/pt-yr; six MVR, 2.3%/pt-yr); three transient peripheral emboli (two AVR, 0.3%/pt-yr; one MVR, 0.4%/pt-yr); four paravalvular leaks (two AVR, 0.3%/pt-yr; two MVR, 0.8%/pt-yr); and one episode of valve thrombosis (MVR, 0.4%/pt-yr; AVR, 0%/pt-yr). Reoperation was required in two patients: one AVR (paravalvular leak, 0.2%/pt-yr) and one MVR (replacement due to thrombosis, 0.4%/pt-yr).
Conclusion:
These results indicate that intermediate-term results with the ATS mechanical prosthesis continue to be excellent, though further long-term follow up is warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Valves
The AV valves prevent the backflow of blood from the ventricles to the atria during ventricular contraction. These valves function with the assistance of the chordae tendineae and papillary muscles. When the ventricles are relaxed, the chordae tendineae are slack, allowing blood to flow from the atria into the...
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction

