Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating decision aids--where next?

Alicia O'Cathain1, Kate J Thomas

  • 1Medical Care Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. a.ocathain@sheffield.ac.uk

Health Expectations : an International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy
|May 1, 2004
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Developing a rehabilitation intervention for eating and drinking difficulties following stroke through co-design stakeholder workshops.

BMC health services research·2026
Same author

Outpatient paracentesis for Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome: STOP-OHSS feasibility study and RCT Synopsis.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2026
Same author

Clear Conversations: a mixed methods evaluation of a verbal health literacy initiative for health service providers.

BMC health services research·2026
Same author

Men's Preferences for Exiting Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Surveillance: A Deliberative Engagement Session Study.

Patient preference and adherence·2026
Same author

Updating the Good Reporting of a Mixed Methods Study (GRAMMS) Reporting Guidelines: Protocol for a Methodological Review and Modified Delphi Process.

JMIR research protocols·2026
Same author

What models of community palliative rehabilitation exist for adults in the United Kingdom? - a national cross-sectional survey.

BMC palliative care·2026
Same journal

Balancing Trade-Offs in Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement in Rapid Evaluation: Reflections and Lessons.

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy·2026
Same journal

Powerless or Powerful? Healthcare Professionals' Construction of Agency in Patient and Family Engagement Accounts.

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy·2026
Same journal

Family Carer Involvement in Dementia Care Research: A Scoping Review and Expert Consultation.

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy·2026
Same journal

Meta-Research on the Science of Lived Experience Engagement in Mental Health and Substance Use Health Research: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Synthesis.

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy·2026
Same journal

'Working Together to Meet in the Middle'. A Qualitative Descriptive Study of Power Dynamics in Lived Experience and Family Engagement in Mental Health and Substance Use Health Research.

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy·2026
Same journal

Perceptions of People From South Asian Backgrounds With Chronic Kidney Disease on Digital Health Interventions: Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement Consultation Focus Group.

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy·2026
See all related articles

Patient decision aids improve healthcare choices but require pragmatic trials for real-world effectiveness. Developing implementation packages with healthcare professionals and patients is crucial for overcoming barriers and ensuring successful adoption.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Patient Engagement
  • Medical Decision-Making

Background:

  • Decision aids empower patients in healthcare choices.
  • Existing research primarily uses explanatory trials, showing effectiveness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate lessons learned from a maternity care decision aid ('Informed Choice' leaflets).
  • To propose future strategies for evaluating and implementing decision aids effectively in real-world settings.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluation of an 'Informed Choice' leaflet set in maternity care.
  • Analysis of existing evidence on decision aid trials and implementation.
  • Proposal for developing 'decision aid implementation packages'.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Decision aids are effective in explanatory trials but face implementation challenges in practice.
  • Real-world use is limited by factors like time constraints for healthcare professionals.
  • Need for strategies addressing structural barriers to patient involvement.

Conclusions:

  • Pragmatic trials are essential to assess real-world decision aid effectiveness.
  • Implementation strategies must address practical barriers and involve stakeholders.
  • Developed 'decision aid implementation packages' require pragmatic evaluation.